Resident 360 Study Plans on AMBOSS
Find all Resident 360 study plans on AMBOSS
Fast Facts
A brief refresher with useful tables, figures, and research summaries
Pediatric Sedation and Analgesia
The relief of pain and anxiety becomes one of the most important aspects of care in the critically ill child. Often, infusions are employed as a means of delivering a continuous level of patient analgesia. The ventilated pediatric patient is a unique challenge; endotracheal tube discomfort, ventilator asynchrony, and severity of lung disease are important factors necessitating the use of sedative and anxiolytic agents. In this section, we review common approaches to sedation and analgesia of the critically ill child and long-term adverse effects, with primary focus on agents used in the child who is mechanically ventilated.
Despite their benefit, continuous infusions of sedatives and analgesics have been shown to be independent predictors of prolonged mechanical ventilation and increased length of stay in the PICU. Additionally, consequences of these infusions include dependence and associated risks of acute withdrawal, delirium, and potential long-term effects on the developing brain.
Practice varies in the approach to sedation and analgesia in children, because few studies in children are available to guide appropriate selection of specific agents. Some studies in children have suggested that the use of objective assessments to guide appropriate levels of sedation and analgesia, and protocols to escalate dosages and wean from infusions, reduce the number of days of exposure to agents. However, the largest trial to date failed to show decreased duration of mechanical ventilation in intubated patients who were treated with a sedation protocol.
Assessment
Several objective tools have been developed to guide the appropriate level of sedation of PICU patients based on clinical scenario. The Richmond Agitation-Sedation Scale and the State Behavioral Scale are two such tools.
| Richmond Agitation and Sedation Scale (RASS) | ||
|---|---|---|
| +4 | Combative | Violent, immediate danger to self and staff |
| +3 | Very agitated | Pulls at lines or tubes, aggressive |
| +2 | Agitated | Frequent, nonpurposeful movements, fights ventilator |
| +1 | Restless | Anxious, apprehensive, but movements not aggressive or vigorous |
| 0 | Alert and calm | |
| -1 | Drowsy | Not fully alert, but has sustained awakening to voice (eye opening and eye contact ≥10 seconds) |
| -2 | Light sedation | Briefly awakens to voice (eye opening and eye contact <10 seconds) |
| -3 | Moderate sedation | Movement or eye opening to voice (but no eye contact) |
| -4 | Deep sedation | No response to voice, but movement or eye opening to physical stimulation |
| -5 | Unarousable | No response to voice or physical stimulation |
| Score | Description | Definition |
|---|---|---|
| -3 | Unresponsive | No spontaneous respiratory effort No cough or coughs only with suctioning No response to noxious stimuli Unable to pay attention to care provider Does not distress with any procedure (including noxious) Does not move |
| -2 | Responsive to noxious stimuli | Spontaneous yet supported breathing Coughs with suctioning/repositioning Responds to noxious stimuli Unable to pay attention to care provider Will distress with a noxious procedure Does not move/occasional movement of extremities or shifting of position |
| -1 | Responsive to gentle touch or voice | Spontaneous but ineffective nonsupported breaths Coughs with suctioning/repositioning Responds to touch/voice Able to pay attention but drifts off after stimulation Distresses with procedures Able to calm with comforting touch or voice when stimulus removed Occasional movement of extremities or shifting of position |
| 0 | Awake and able to calm | Spontaneous and effective breathing Coughs when repositioned/Occasional spontaneous cough Responds to voice/No external stimulus is required to elicit response Spontaneously pays attention to care provider Distresses with procedures Able to calm with comforting touch or voice when stimulus removed Occasional movement of extremities or shifting of position/increased movement (restless, squirming) |
| +1 | Restless and difficult to calm | Spontaneous effective breathing/Having difficulty breathing with ventilator Occasional spontaneous cough Responds to voice/No external stimulus is required to elicit response Drifts off/Spontaneously pays attention to care provider Intermittently unsafe Does not consistently calm despite 5 minute attempt/unable to console Increased movement (restless, squirming) |
| +2 | Agitated | May have difficulty breathing with ventilator Coughing spontaneously No external stimulus required to elicit response Spontaneously pays attention to care provider Unsafe (biting ETT, pulling at lines, cannot be left alone) Unable to console Increased movement (restless, squirming or thrashing side-to-side, kicking legs) |
Management
Sedation
Benzodiazepines have historically been the mainstay of sedation in the PICU, administered as either intermittent doses or a continuous infusion. The most common agent used is midazolam. Major adverse effects of benzodiazepines include respiratory depression, hypotension, and delirium.
Dexmedetomidine is an alpha-2-adrenergic agonist that can be used for sedation of critically ill children. It does not cause respiratory depression but typically does not provide levels of deep sedation. Major adverse effects are bradycardia, hypotension, and hypertension at higher doses.
Propofol is an anesthetic drug that is commonly used in operative procedures for sedation. Pediatric patients are at risk for propofol-related infusion syndrome (PRIS), which can cause irreversible metabolic derangements and bradycardia. Risk factors for PRIS include young age, higher doses of propofol infusion, and simultaneous treatment with catecholamines, although the syndrome has been described in patients without these characteristics. Given this risk, propofol is used cautiously and is generally limited to use for less than 24 hours.
Analgesia
Pediatric patients requiring continuous analgesia are typically managed with opioid infusions. Common agents include morphine and fentanyl. Major adverse effects include respiratory depression, tolerance, and dependence. Additionally, intermittent dosing of nonopioid analgesics is often also used, including acetaminophen and NSAIDs.
Delirium
Delirium is a well-recognized acute neurocognitive disturbance seen in pediatric ICU patients. Delirium can be characterized as hypoactive, hyperactive, or a mix of both based on psychomotor symptoms. Sedation exposure, particularly with benzodiazepines, is considered a precipitating risk factor for the development of ICU delirium. Routine screening in critically ill pediatric patients using a validated tool (e.g., the Cornell Assessment of Pediatric Delirium [CAPD] and the preschool or pediatric Preschool Confusion Assessment Method for the ICU [pCAM-ICU]) is recommended. Nonpharmacologic therapies should be considered initially before pharmacologic therapies (e.g., atypical antipsychotics and haloperidol) are used for delirium refractory to non-pharmacologic treatment.
Discontinuation of Infusion Therapy
As children recover from their illness or need for mechanical ventilation, care must be taken to prevent withdrawal from benzodiazepine and opioid dependence. In general, patients who are on infusions for ≥5 days are at risk of withdrawal symptoms, but children who have received shorter duration of therapy can also be affected. Many strategies have been employed to prevent withdrawal, including slowly weaning off of infusions and use of intermittent replacement therapy with intravenous or enteral equivalents of drugs including lorazepam, methadone, and clonidine. Children should be assessed for signs and symptoms of withdrawal, generally with an objective scoring tool, and treated with “rescue” doses of drugs to lessen discomfort if withdrawal were to occur. One such validated tool is the Withdrawal Assessment Tool (WAT-1), which assesses withdrawal-related symptoms such as gastrointestinal discomfort (diarrhea, loose stools, vomiting), tremors, sweating, yawning/sneezing, and muscle tone.
For more information on procedural sedation and analgesia and rapid-sequence induction for intubation, please see Common Procedures in the Pediatric Emergency Medicine rotation guide.
Research
Landmark clinical trials and other important studies
Smith et al. Crit Care Med 2016.
Curley MAQ et al. JAMA 2015.
This randomized, controlled trial assessed whether critically ill children managed with a nurse-implemented, goal-directed sedation protocol experienced fewer days of mechanical ventilation than patients receiving usual care.
Traube et al. Crit Care Med 2014.
Deeter KH et al. Crit Care Med 2011.
This retrospective cohort study found that a nurse-driven sedation protocol significantly decreased the number of days of benzodiazepine and opioid infusions.
Hartman ME et al. Pediatr Crit Care Med 2009.
This systematic review found no evidence for or against specific sedatives in the PICU.
Curley MAQ et al. Pediatr Crit Care Med 2006.
A prospective evaluation of a rating scale for systematic assessment of the sedation-agitation continuum in young pediatric patients supported on mechanical ventilation
Reviews
The best overviews of the literature on this topic
Egbuta and Mason. J Clin Med. 2021.
Guidelines
The current guidelines from the major specialty associations in the field
Smith H AB et al. Pediatric Crit Care 2022.