Resident 360 Study Plans on AMBOSS
Find all Resident 360 study plans on AMBOSS
Fast Facts
A brief refresher with useful tables, figures, and research summaries
Venous Thromboembolism and Anticoagulation
Venous thromboembolism (VTE) is a common condition encountered in general internal medicine practice and includes pulmonary embolism (PE) and lower-extremity deep-vein thrombosis (DVT). Knowing how to diagnose and manage VTE is crucial. See the IM Oncology rotation guide for treatment of VTE in patients with malignancy.
In section, we address the following topics:
Diagnosis of Pulmonary Embolism
In patients presenting acutely, the diagnosis of PE can be made with the following steps:
Step 1: Assess the patient’s pretest probability for PE by calculating their Wells score using the Wells clinical decision rule for PE (see calculator).
Symptom or Sign | Score |
---|---|
Clinical signs and symptoms of deep-vein thrombosis (DVT) | 3 |
Tachycardia (>100 beats/minute) | 1.5 |
Immobilization or surgery in the previous 4 weeks | 1.5 |
Previous DVT or PE | 1.5 |
Hemoptysis | 1 |
Malignancy | 1 |
Alternative diagnoses are less likely than PE | 3 |
Step 2: Based on the patient’s pretest probability for PE according to the Wells score, perform an initial workup as follows:
-
Low-risk Wells score: Patients who have a Wells score <2 are at low risk for PE (prevalence, 1.3%) and are typically further risk-stratified using the pulmonary embolism rule-out criteria (PERC):
-
PERC criteria:
age <50 years
heart rate <100 beats per minute
oxyhemoglobin saturation ≥95%
no hemoptysis
no estrogen use
no prior DVT or PE
no unilateral leg swelling
no surgery or trauma requiring hospitalization within the prior 4 weeks
-
PERC interpretation:
If all eight of these criteria are met, then no further testing is needed.
If any of the criteria are not met, then a D-dimer measurement can be helpful; a normal value can help rule out PE and obviate the need for imaging.
-
-
Intermediate-risk Wells score: In intermediate-risk patients (those with a Wells score of 2-6; incidence of PE, 16.2%), a D-dimer level is indicated.
-
D-dimer interpretation:
In patients with a negative D-dimer result, no further workup is needed.
In patients with a positive D-dimer, proceed to CT angiography.
If the D-dimer level is <0.5 µg/mL, further imaging is typically not needed. However, the full clinical picture should be taken into account for patients who fall into this group.
Imaging to rule out PE may be appropriate for some intermediate-risk patients, regardless of D-dimer value. This may apply to older patients, those with cardiopulmonary compromise, those with a Wells score at the upper end of the intermediate range, and other patients where the clinical evaluation raises concern for PE beyond what is reflected in the Wells score.
-
-
High-risk Wells score:
Imaging (usually CT angiography) should be obtained in all high-risk patients (those with a Wells score >6; incidence of PE, 37.5%).
There is no role for measuring a D-dimer level in these patients, as a normal D-dimer level does not adequately rule out PE.
Note: Before using D-dimer as a screening test for VTE, remember that it is nonspecific for any coagulation occurring in the body. Thus, a patient undergoing knee replacement would be expected to have an elevated postoperative D-dimer level after surgery. Certain disease states (e.g., cancer, renal disease, and cirrhosis) are associated with chronic subclinical disseminated intravascular coagulation (DIC) that may not manifest with typical DIC signs (e.g., low fibrinogen or elevated prothrombin time [PT] or partial thromboplastin time [PTT]) but will often be associated with an elevated D-dimer level that is not clinically meaningful. Furthermore, D-dimer levels tend to increase in older people such that alternative criteria must be applied to D-dimer elevations with aging (patient age in years x 10 mcg/l is thought to represent the upper limit for that individual).
View the ACP Pathway for the Evaluation of Patients with Suspected PE here.
Diagnosis of DVT
In patients presenting acutely, the diagnosis of DVT can be made with the following steps:
Step 1: Assess the patient’s pretest probability of DVT by calculating their Wells score using the Wells clinical decision rule for DVT (see Medscape calculator).
Clinical Features | Score |
---|---|
Active cancer | +1 |
Bedridden recently (>3 days) or major surgery within 4 weeks | +1 |
Calf swelling more than 3 cm compared to the other leg | +1 |
Collateral (nonvaricose) superficial veins present | +1 |
Entire leg swollen | +1 |
Localized tenderness along the deep venous system | +1 |
Pitting edema confined to the symptomatic leg | +1 |
Paralysis, paresis, or recent immobilization to the lower extremity | +1 |
Previously documented DVT | +1 |
Alternative diagnoses to DVT as likely or more likely | -2 |
Interpretation of the Wells score for DVT:
≤0: low risk for DVT
1-2: intermediate risk for DVT
≥3: high risk for DVT
Step 2: Based on the patient’s pretest probability of DVT according to the Wells score, perform an initial workup as describe:
-
Low-risk Wells score:
Patients who have a Wells score ≤0 are at low risk for DVT (prevalence of DVT, 3%) and a D-dimer measurement is helpful; a normal value rules out DVT and obviates the need for imaging.
-
Intermediate- or high-risk Wells score:
Imaging (usually ultrasonography) should be obtained in all intermediate or high-risk patients.
A Wells score of 1−2 indicates intermediate risk (prevalence of DVT, 16.6%) and a score ≥3 indicates high-risk (prevalence of DVT, 76.6%).
There is no role for measuring a D-dimer level in these patients prior to imaging as a normal D-dimer level does not adequately rule out DVT. If clinical suspicion for DVT remains after a negative ultrasonography test, then D-dimer measurement may be performed. Should the D-dimer be positive, then repeat ultrasonography is indicated in one week.
![[Image]](content_item_media_uploads/r360.i017390_fig001.jpg)
(Source: Venous Thromboembolism. BMJ 2006. Reprinted with permission.)
Diagnosis of VTE in Pregnancy
The incidence of VTE increases fourfold during pregnancy, and the above algorithms have not been tested in pregnancy. The pregnancy-adapted YEARS algorithm (shown below) can be used instead. The goal during pregnancy is minimal radiation exposure to the fetus.
For diagnosis of PE, a ventilation-perfusion (V/Q) scan should be considered first if the patient is clinically stable and a V/Q scan is available.
For diagnosis of DVT in pregnancy, ultrasonography remains the test of choice.
![[Image]](content_item_media_uploads/r360.i017390_fig002.jpg)
(Source: Pregnancy-Adapted YEARS Algorithm for Diagnosis of Suspected Pulmonary Embolism. N Engl J Med 2019.)
For more detailed information regarding VTE in pregnancy, see the American Society of Hematology (ASH) VTE in Pregnancy Pocket Guide.
View a NEJM Quick Take video for a summary of new research findings on PE in pregnancy.
Management of VTE
Evidence-based guidelines from the American Society of Hematology (ASH) describe the management of VTE in three phases:
initial management
primary treatment
secondary prevention
Phase 1: Initial Management
Initial management includes:
Ambulatory care vs. inpatient care: Deciding whether ambulatory care or inpatient care is most appropriate for managing the patient’s VTE:
-
Inpatient care is indicated for patients with VTE and the following presentations:
massive DVT (including proximal deep-vein thrombosis)
limb-threatening DVT
high risk of bleeding with anticoagulation therapy
symptomatic PE (including when intravenous analgesics are required)
Ambulatory care may be suitable for patients with VTE and none of the above listed presentations, at low risk for complications, and with no other conditions requiring hospitalization. In this scenario, primary treatment (phase 2) can be initiated.
Type of emergent treatment: Deciding on type of emergent treatment: Emergent treatments for VTE are anticoagulation therapy (most patients), fibrinolytic therapy (thrombolytic therapy), and inferior vena cava filter.
-
Anticoagulation therapy: The first choice for most patients with VTE is with direct oral anticoagulants (DOACs) over vitamin K antagonists (VKAs).
No one DOAC (e.g., dabigatran, rivaroxaban, apixaban, edoxaban, or betrixaban) is recommended over another.
Renal or hepatic insufficiency, concomitant cancer, treatment cost, patient preference, and dosing frequency should be considered when selecting anticoagulation therapy.
During VKA initiation, retreatment with low-molecular-weight heparin (LMWH) for a minimum of 5 days is necessary. After 5 days, LMWH can be discontinued provided a therapeutic international normalized ratio (INR) has been achieved for 24 hours.
-
For treatment with a DOAC, the need for LMWH pretreatment varies depending on DOAC choice.
For patients initiating treatment with dabigatran or edoxaban, pretreatment with LMWH for up to 5 to 10 days is needed before switching to the DOAC.
For patients treated with rivaroxaban or apixaban, there is no need for pretreatment with LMWH, but a higher dose is administered for the first 3 weeks of rivaroxaban therapy and the first week of apixaban therapy.
For LMWH pretreatment, unfractionated heparin can be used instead of LMWH if there is concern for bleeding, need for quick reversal, or renal dysfunction.
Other anticoagulants with novel mechanisms are being investigated (e.g. factor XI inhibitors, factor Xia inhibitors, factor XII inhibitors) to reduce thrombosis risk while minimizing bleeding risk.
-
Fibrinolytic therapy (thrombolytic therapy): Anticoagulation therapy alone is recommended for most patients with VTE. However, thrombolytic therapy followed by anticoagulation is recommended for patients with the following characteristics:
limb-threatening DVT
selected younger patients with symptomatic DVT involving the iliac and common femoral veins (conferring increased risk of post-thrombotic syndrome) who are at low risk for bleeding, have a preference for rapid resolution of symptoms, and accept the added risk of major bleeding associated with thrombolytic therapy
PE with hemodynamic compromise
PE with echocardiography and/or biomarkers compatible with right ventricular dysfunction but without hemodynamic compromise (submassive PE)
Note: When thrombolytic therapy is used in patients with DVT, catheter-directed thrombolysis is recommended over systemic thrombolysis.
Inferior vena cava (IVC) filter: In patients with a contraindication to anticoagulation, insertion of a retrievable IVC filter may be appropriate. IVC filters are not recommended in the context of trauma. (View a NEJM Quick Take video summary of a recent multicenter trial of IVCs after major trauma.)
Phase 2: Primary Treatment
Primary treatment refers to the minimal length of time a patient must be on therapeutic anticoagulation for treatment of the initial VTE before considering long-term treatment. A 3−6-month course of anticoagulation is recommended regardless of whether the VTE is provoked by a transient risk factor, a chronic risk factor, or unprovoked.
Primary management of upper-extremity DVT differs slightly from management of other VTEs. Up to 10% of DVTs occur in the upper extremities. The most common cause is from indwelling catheters (i.e., peripherally inserted central catheter [PICC] and central venous catheters). Upper-extremity DVTs may embolize, but because of their small size relative to lower-extremity clots, they are unlikely to lead to PE or death.
![[Image]](content_item_media_uploads/r360.i017390_fig003.jpg)
(Source: Deep-Vein Thrombosis of the Upper Extremities. N Engl J Med 2011.)
Phase 3: Secondary Prevention
Secondary prevention refers to the decision to continue anticoagulation therapy following primary treatment.
Unprovoked VTE: Indefinite anticoagulation is appropriate after primary treatment for the majority of patients with unprovoked VTE (except those who have a high risk of bleeding). However, for patients who are undecided or for whom the balance between risks and benefits is uncertain, decision-making can be aided by prognostic scores, D-dimer testing, or ultrasound assessment for residual thrombosis from an initial DVT. These patients should be referred to a hematologist.
VTE provoked by a chronic risk factor: Indefinite antithrombotic therapy is recommended after primary treatment.
VTE provoked by a transient risk factor: Cessation of antithrombotic therapy is recommended after primary treatment.
Depending on the clinical scenario, DOACs can sometimes be reduced to a lower dose (see EINSTEIN CHOICE and AMPLIFY-EXT trials).
Anticoagulant Reversal
Anticoagulant therapy is very effective at preventing recurrent VTE but is associated with an increased risk of bleeding. Major bleeding occurs in 1%−3% of patients treated with VKAs each year. The relative risk of major bleeding with DOACs is approximately 30% lower.
Warfarin reversal: Warfarin inhibits synthesis of the vitamin K-dependent clotting factors (II, VII, IX, X) as well as the natural anticoagulant proteins C and S. The anticoagulant effect of warfarin can be reversed multiple ways and is dependent on the urgency of the clinical situation as described in the following table:
Clinical Scenario | Anticoagulant Reversal |
---|---|
Supratherapeutic INR but <5.0 without bleeding |
Decrease or hold warfarin dose Monitor |
INR ≥5.0 and <9.0 without bleeding |
Hold warfarin Consider vitamin K (1.0-2.5 mg by mouth) Recheck INR in 24 hours |
INR ≥9.0 without bleeding |
Hold warfarin Give vitamin K (2.5-5.0 mg by mouth) Recheck INR in 24 hours Consider additional vitamin K if needed |
Supratherapeutic INR with minor bleeding INR >3.0 INR ≥5.0 |
Hold warfarin Supplement with vitamin K (1.0-2.5 mg by mouth) |
Serious or life-threatening bleed |
Hold warfarin and give vitamin K (10 mg) via slow IV infusion Provide fresh-frozen plasma, prothrombin complex concentrate, or recombinant factor VIIa, depending on situational urgency |
DOAC reversal: Reversal of DOAC therapy is recommended in the following clinical settings only:
Bleeding at a critical site where there is a high risk that the function of a vital organ will be compromised with resulting disability or death. This includes intracranial, thoracic, airway, pericardial, intra-abdominal (non-gastrointestinal), retroperitoneal, intra-articular, and intramuscular bleeding.
Bleeding that is life-threatening.
Major bleeding that fails to respond to initial control measures.
Factor Xa reversal: Reversal of factor Xa can be achieved by stopping the oral direct Xa inhibitor and either:
administering 4-factor prothrombin complex concentrates (4F-PCCs)
administering coagulation factor Xa (recombinant) such as andexanet alfa. Andexanet alfa is a recombinant form of factor Xa that binds and sequesters the anticoagulant, thus allowing homeostasis to occur using the patient’s endogenous factor Xa.
Dabigatran reversal: Stop dabigatran and administer idarucizumab.
Unfractionated heparin reversal: Heparin works by binding to and activating antithrombin III, which in turn inactivates thrombin and factor Xa. Heparin’s effect can be neutralized by stopping the infusion and administering protamine, after which the PTT must be monitored. Protamine must be used with caution because it can cause an anaphylactoid reaction. Protamine can be used to reverse the effects of low-molecular-weight heparin as well.
More detail on reversal of specific anticoagulants can be found here.
Thrombophilia Testing
Workup of unprovoked VTE should only rarely include hereditary thrombophilia testing (factor V Leiden mutation, prothrombin 20210A gene mutation, antithrombin, proteins C and S, and antiphospholipid antibodies) and should not be ordered in the acute setting (do not order in a hospitalized patient immediately after a clot or if the patient is on anticoagulation therapy). See this review and the 2023 American Society of Hematology guidelines for management of VTE and thrombophilia testing.
Research
Landmark clinical trials and other important studies
Quenby S et al. Lancet. 2023.
In a randomized controlled trial in patients with recurrent pregnancy loss and inherited thrombophilia, low-molecular-weight heparin did not result in higher livebirth rates than standard of care.
![[Image]](content_item_thumbnails/r360.i017390_res1.jpg)
Kearon C et al. N Engl J Med 2019.
![[Image]](content_item_thumbnails/r360.i017390_res2.jpg)
Connolly SJ et al. N Engl J Med 2019.
Andexanet alfa is a modified recombinant inactive form of human factor Xa. In 352 patients with acute major bleeding within 18 hours after administration of a factor Xa inhibitor, 82% of those who had received apixaban had good or excellent hemostatic efficacy at 12 hours.
![[Image]](content_item_thumbnails/r360.i017390_res3.jpg)
van der Pol LM et al. N Engl J Med 2019.
This study showed that the YEARS diagnostic algorithm could be used across all trimesters of pregnancy to safely rule out PE and minimize radiation exposure to pregnant patients.
![[Image]](content_item_thumbnails/r360.i017390_res4.jpg)
Ho KM et al. N Engl J Med 2019.
In this clinical trial, prophylactic placement of an inferior vena cava filter in trauma patients did not lower the incidence of pulmonary embolism or death at 90 days.
![[Image]](content_item_thumbnails/r360.i017390_res5.jpg)
Weitz JI et al. N Engl J Med 2017.
In the EINSTEIN CHOICE randomized phase 3 study, the risk of a recurrent VTE event was significantly lower with rivaroxaban (either 20mg daily or 10mg daily) than with aspirin, without a significant increase in bleeding rates.
![[Image]](content_item_thumbnails/r360.i017390_res6.jpg)
Pollack Jr CV et al. N Engl J Med 2017.
This clinical trial showed the efficacy of idarcucizumab for reversal of dabigatran in patients with uncontrolled bleeding or who were undergoing an urgent procedure.
![[Image]](content_item_thumbnails/r360.i017390_res7.jpg)
Mismetti P et al. JAMA 2015.
This RTC found that routine placement of retrievable IVC filters does not reduce the risk of recurrent pulmonary embolism compared to anticoagulation.
![[Image]](content_item_thumbnails/r360.i017390_res8.jpg)
Agnelli G et al. N Engl J Med 2013.
In the AMPLIFY-EXT randomized phase 3 study, risk of recurrent VTE event was reduced with either apixaban treatment dose (5 mg) or a thromboprophylactic dose (2.5 mg), without increasing the rate of major bleeding.
![[Image]](content_item_thumbnails/r360.i017390_res9.jpg)
Wells PS et al. N Engl J Med 2003.
This study concluded that D-dimer testing with clinical estimation of pretest probability and ultrasound imaging simplifies the diagnosis of DVT in outpatients without compromising safety. The results established the validity of the Wells criteria.
![[Image]](content_item_thumbnails/r360.i017390_res10.jpg)
Reviews
The best overviews of the literature on this topic
Kahn S and de Wit K. N Engl Med 2022
![[Image]](content_item_thumbnails/r360.i017390_rev1.jpg)
Young T and Sriram KB. Cochrane Database Syst Rev 2020.
![[Image]](content_item_thumbnails/r360.i017390_rev2.jpg)
Gotoh S et al. J Am Heart Assoc 2020.
![[Image]](content_item_thumbnails/r360.i017390_rev3.jpg)
Elsebaie MAT et al. J Thromb Haemost 2019.
![[Image]](content_item_thumbnails/r360.i017390_rev4.jpg)
Hepburn-Brown M et al. Intern Med J 2019.
![[Image]](content_item_thumbnails/r360.i017390_rev5.jpg)
Tritschler T et al. JAMA 2018.
![[Image]](content_item_thumbnails/r360.i017390_rev6.jpg)
Connors JM. N Engl J Med 2017.
![[Image]](content_item_thumbnails/r360.i017390_rev7.jpg)
Kucher N. N Engl J Med 2011.
![[Image]](content_item_thumbnails/r360.i017390_rev8.jpg)
Guidelines
The current guidelines from the major specialty associations in the field
Middeldorp S et al. Blood Adv 2023.
![[Image]](content_item_thumbnails/r360.i017390_guide1.jpg)
Tomaselli GF et al. J Am Coll Cardiol 2020.
![[Image]](content_item_thumbnails/r360.i017390_guide2.jpg)
Ortel TL et al. Blood Advances 2020.
![[Image]](content_item_thumbnails/r360.i017390_guide3.jpg)
Bates S et al. Blood Adv 2018.
![[Image]](content_item_thumbnails/r360.i017390_guide4.jpg)
Kearon C et al. Chest 2016.
![[Image]](content_item_thumbnails/r360.i017390_guide5.jpg)