Resident 360 Study Plans on AMBOSS
Find all Resident 360 study plans on AMBOSS
Fast Facts
A brief refresher with useful tables, figures, and research summaries
Systemic Lupus Erythematosus
Systemic lupus erythematosus (SLE) is a systemic autoimmune disorder with heterogeneous presentation and severity.
Epidemiology: Twenty percent of patients present by the age of 20. SLE is more common in females than males and is more common and severe in nonwhite populations.
Pathophysiology: SLE is associated with dysfunction of both the innate and adaptive immune systems. Autoreactive B and T cells are responsible for the generation of autoantibodies. These antibodies can cause disease directly or through immune complex activation and deposition in various tissues, triggering an inflammatory response. Activation of dendritic cells, interferon type I signaling, and defective clearance of apoptotic cellular debris are also implicated in potentiating the proinflammatory disease state.
Clinical Manifestations
Constitutional features:
fatigue
fever (usually low-grade temperature [100-101°F/38°C] rather than high-spiking fever)
weight loss (unintentional)
Mucocutaneous involvement:
rashes (photosensitive, malar, discoid, vasculitic)
oral ulcers (typically nonpainful ulceration on hard palate, but can be painful buccal ulcers)
alopecia (short, friable hairs, easily pulled with gentle traction)
![[Image]](content_item_media_uploads/nejmicm2029589_f1.jpg)
(Source: Malar Rash. N Engl J Med 2021.)
![[Image]](content_item_media_uploads/Cutaneous-Lupus_k93fdv.jpg)
(Source: Cutaneous Lupus — “The Pimple That Never Went Away.” N Engl J Med 2016.)
Musculoskeletal involvement:
nonerosive polyarthritis (typically of the small joints of the hands)
arthralgias and myalgias
Hematologic involvement:
autoimmune hemolytic anemia (+Coombs/DAT)
thrombotic microangiopathic anemia
immune-mediated thrombocytopenia
leukopenia (usually lymphopenia)
macrophage activation syndrome
antiphospholipid antibody syndrome leading to thrombosis
Renal involvement:
glomerulonephritis: due to immune complex deposition, can present with nephritic or nephrotic syndrome
“full house” immunofluorescence pattern on biopsy: diffuse immune complex deposits containing C3, C1q, IgG, IgA, IgM (see image below)
renal artery or vein thrombosis: in patients with a hypercoagulable state; may be associated with antiphospholipid antibodies
Neuropsychiatric involvement:
seizures
psychosis
cognitive impairment (“brain fog”)
transient ischemic attack/stroke
transverse myelitis
chorea
cranial nerve palsy
lupus headache (unremitting and unresponsive to medications; controversial as a neuropsychiatric manifestation of SLE)
Cardiac involvement:
pericarditis
valvular abnormalities (e.g., Libman-Sacks endocarditis, valvular regurgitation)
myocarditis
increased risk of coronary artery disease (myocardial infarctions reported in young women with SLE)
Pulmonary involvement:
pleural effusions
interstitial lung disease
acute lupus pneumonitis
diffuse alveolar hemorrhage
shrinking lung syndrome (pleuritic chest pain, shortness of breath, and progressive decrease in lung volumes)
Gastrointestinal involvement:
autoimmune hepatitis
mesenteric vasculitis
pancreatitis
protein-losing enteropathy
esophageal dysmotility and reflux
Diagnosis
History and Physical Exam
Pay attention to potential clinical features of SLE (as noted above)
Laboratory Evaluation
-
antinuclear antibody (ANA) test: very sensitive for diagnosis of SLE (positive in >98% of patients) but not specific (positive in 10%-20% of healthy children)
-
interpretation of ANA profile:
anti-double-stranded DNA (dsDNA): specific for SLE, associated with renal disease, and can be tracked as a marker of disease activity
anti-Smith: 100% specific for SLE
anti-ribonucleoprotein (RNP): seen in patients with SLE and in mixed connective tissue disease (high titer)
anti-Scl-70: seen in patients with scleroderma and overlap syndromes
anti-SSA and -SSB: seen in either primary Sjögren syndrome or SLE
-
-
complement levels: monitor for low C3 and C4
low levels trend as markers of disease activity
very low CH50 can suggest genetic complement deficiency
-
antiphospholipid antibodies: positive antiphospholipid antibodies are associated with a higher prevalence of thrombosis, pregnancy-associated morbidity, neuropsychiatric SLE, and SLE-associated cardiovascular disease
prolonged partial thromboplastin time (PTT)
dilute Russell’s viper-venom time (DRVVT, aka lupus anticoagulant)
anti-cardiolipin IgM/IgG
anti-beta-2-glycoprotein IgM/IgG
false-positive rapid plasma reagin (RPR)
-
CBC with differential: monitor for
leukopenia (absolute leukocyte count <4000/mm3)
lymphopenia (<1500/mm3)
thrombocytopenia (<100,000/mm3)
autoimmune hemolytic anemia
direct antiglobulin test (DAT or Coombs test): especially if anemia is present
peripheral smear: obtain if hemolytic anemia present to evaluate for schistocytes suggestive of thrombotic microangiopathy (thrombotic thrombocytopenic purpura [TTP]/hemolytic uremic syndrome [HUS]) instead of antibody-mediated hemolysis
inflammatory markers: often low-normal C-reactive protein (CRP) with very elevated erythrocyte sedimentation rate (ESR)
CMP: elevated creatinine and hypoalbuminemia suggests renal disease with proteinuria
urinalysis/protein-to-creatinine ratio: if proteinuria is present, obtain first morning urine protein-to-creatinine ratio (normal value, <0.2)
total IgG: often elevated in new-onset SLE
Additional Evaluation
renal biopsy: consider if concern for renal involvement; biopsy and histologic classification guide management (see International Society of Nephrology/Renal Pathology Society [ISN/RPS] classification of lesions in lupus nephritis)
echocardiogram and electrocardiogram: for baseline screening and monitoring as needed
chest x-ray: if signs or symptoms of pleural or pericardial effusions
Classification Criteria
Classification criteria for identifying SLE disease in clinical studies are often used to guide the diagnosis of SLE, but it is important to note that they were developed for classification in clinical research studies and not as diagnostic criteria. Although the classification criteria do not always perform well in clinical practice and should not be strictly followed for diagnosis, they can be useful as a guide or starting point when SLE is under consideration.
For decades, researchers used the American College of Rheumatology (ACR) Criteria for the Classification of SLE, which included 11 possible criteria (listed below). A patient was considered to have SLE if 4 criteria were positive. In 2012, an expert panel developed the Systemic Lupus International Collaborating Clinics Classification (SLICC) Criteria that required 4 of 17 items be present, with at least 1 clinical and 1 immunologic criterion or biopsy-proven lupus nephritis with positive ANA or anti-DNA test. The SLICC criteria and a 2019 European League Against Rheumatism and American College of Rheumatology (EULAR/ACR) update represent improved classification schemes. The three classification criteria are frameworks to guide the work up for patients with concern for SLE. No one classification schema is considered a gold standard.
The criteria are cumulative, occurring either serially or simultaneously (e.g., even if malar rash has faded at the time of development of a palatal ulcer, both of these criteria are counted).
the American College of Rheumatology (ACR) criteria
the Systemic Lupus International Collaborating Clinics (SLICC) criteria
the 2019 European League Against Rheumatism and American College of Rheumatology (EULAR/ACR) criteria
Requires at least 4 of the following 11 criteria, either serially or simultaneously: |
---|
|
Requires ≥4 criteria (at least 1 clinical and 1 laboratory criterion) or biopsy-proven lupus nephritis with positive ANA or anti-DNA | |
---|---|
Clinical Criteria | Immunologic Criteria |
1. Acute cutaneous lupus | 1. ANA |
2. Chronic cutaneous lupus | 2. Anti-DNA |
3. Oral or nasal ulcers | 3. Anti-Smith |
4. Nonscarring alopecia | 4. Antiphospholipid Ab |
5. Arthritis | 5. Low complement (C3, C4, CH50) |
6. Serositis | 6. Direct Coombs test (do not count in the presence of hemolytic anemia) |
7. Renal | |
8. Neurologic | |
9. Hemolytic anemia | |
10. Leukopenia | |
11. Thrombocytopenia (<100,000/mm3) |
Entry criterion Antinuclear antibodies (ANA) at a titer of ≥ 1:80 on Hep-2 cells or an equivalent positive test (ever) |
If absent, do not classify as SLE If present, apply additive criteria |
Additive criteria Do not count a criterion if there is a more likely explanation than SLE. Occurrence of a criterion on at least one occasion is sufficient. Criteria need not occur simultaneously. Within each domain, only the highest weighted criterion is counter toward the total score§. |
Clinical domains and criteria |
Weight |
Immunology domains and criteria |
Weight |
---|---|---|---|
Constitutional Fever |
2 |
Antiphospholipid antibodies Anti-cardiolipin antibodies OR Anti-β2GP1 antibodies OR Lupus anticoagulant |
2 |
Hematologic Leukopenia Thrombocytopenia Autoimmune hemolysis |
3 4 4 |
||
Neuropsychiatric Delirium Psychosis Seizure |
2 3 5 |
Complement proteins Low C3 OR low C4 Low C3 AND low C4 |
3 4 |
Mucocutaneous Non-scarring alopecia Oral ulcers Subacute cutaneous OR discoid lupus Acute cutaneous lupus |
2 2 4 6 |
SLE-specific antibodies Anti-dsDNA antibody* OR Anti-Smith antibody |
6 |
Serosal Pleural or pericardial effusion Acute pericarditis |
5 6 |
||
Musculoskeletal Joint involvement |
6 |
||
Renal Proteinuria >0.5g/24h Renal biopsy Class II or V lupus nephritis Renal biopsy Class III or IV lupus nephritis |
4 8 10 |
||
Total score: | |||
Classify as Systemic Lupus Erythematosus with a score of 10 or more if entry criterion fulfilled. |
Treatment
-
hydroxychloroquine
for all patients except those with toxicity or intolerance
-
glucocorticoids
oral for mild-to-moderate disease
intravenous (IV) pulse methylprednisolone for lupus nephritis or other severe manifestations (autoimmune cytopenias, neuropsychiatric lupus, severe cutaneous involvement)
for induction with the goal of gradual taper over months; some patients require low-dose prednisone long term
-
glucocorticoid-sparing agents
mycophenolate mofetil: for lupus nephritis, mild-to-moderate hematologic manifestations
IV cyclophosphamide: for proliferative lupus nephritis, neuropsychiatric lupus, organ-threatening disease
methotrexate: for arthritis or mucocutaneous predominant disease
azathioprine: an alternative to mycophenolate mofetil for maintenance medication and can be used during pregnancy
voclosporin: approved for patients aged ≥18 to treat SLE nephritis
-
biologics:
rituximab: for severe hematologic manifestations, antiphospholipid antibody syndrome, neuropsychiatric lupus
belimumab: as adjunctive therapy to standard of care for refractory SLE manifestations
anifrolumab: approved for 18 and older for active SLE despite standard therapy, more effective in cutaneous disease
plasmapheresis: adjunctive/salvage therapy for neuropsychiatric lupus, severe autoimmune cytopenias, or thrombotic microangiopathic anemia
-
sunscreen
minimum SPF of 30 with UVA and UVB protection to prevent ultraviolet light from triggering disease flares
Encourage reduction in sun exposure, long sleeves, hats
-
vitamin D and calcium supplementation
to optimize bone health, especially with chronic use of glucocorticoids
-
immunizations
avoid live vaccines (varicella, measles-mumps-rubella [MMR], intranasal influenza) for individuals on immunosuppressive medications
administer inactivated influenza vaccine annually
-
additional pneumococcal vaccines are recommended for SLE patients on immunosuppressive medications
as of 2023, a combination of PCV13 and PSV23 (to be repeated after 5 years) or PCV20 alone (given one time) are accepted regimens
encourage COVID-19 vaccination (including current CDC guidance on third dose and booster dose depending on age and immunocompromised status)
Research
Landmark clinical trials and other important studies
Chiang HY et al. Lupus 2022.
The results indicated that belimumab plus standard therapy was more effective than placebo plus standard therapy in patients with systemic lupus erythematosus.
![[Image]](content_item_thumbnails/pubmed.jpg)
Shipa M et al. Ann Intern Med 2021.
In this randomized, double-blind, placebo-controlled trial, 52 patients with active SLE received rituximab and then were randomized to receive either belimumab or placebo 4-8 weeks later. Belimumab was associated with a significant reduction in anti-dsDNA antibody levels and a reduction in risk for severe flare as compared with placebo.
![[Image]](content_item_thumbnails/56589.jpg)
Furie R et al. N Engl J Med 2020.
![[Image]](content_item_thumbnails/40505.jpg)
Petri M et al. Arthritis Rheum 2012.
In this study, the authors derived and validated the SLICC classification criteria for SLE in a large patient sample.
![[Image]](content_item_thumbnails/pubmed.jpg)
Rovin BH et al. Arthritis Rheum 2012.
In this randomized, double-blind, placebo-controlled phase 3 trial of 144 patients with lupus nephritis, addition of rituximab therapy to mycophenolate mofetil and glucocorticoid treatment led to more responders and greater reductions in anti-dsDNA and C3/C4 levels but did not improve clinical outcomes after one year of treatment.
![[Image]](content_item_thumbnails/8760.jpg)
Dooley MA et al. N Engl J Med 2011.
In this 36-month, randomized, double-blind, double-dummy, phase 3 study, mycophenolate mofetil was superior to azathioprine in maintaining a renal response to treatment and in preventing relapse in patients with lupus nephritis who had a response to induction therapy.
![[Image]](content_item_thumbnails/8759.jpg)
Appel GB et al. J Am Soc Nephrol 2009.
In this multinational, two-phase (induction and maintenance), randomized trial of 370 patients with classes III through V lupus nephritis, there was no significant difference between mycophenolate mofetil and IV cyclophosphamide for treatment of lupus nephritis.
![[Image]](content_item_thumbnails/8758.jpg)
Alarcón GS et al. Ann Rheum Dis 2007.
This case-control study demonstrated that hydroxychloroquine has a protective effect on survival in patients with systemic lupus erythematosus.
![[Image]](content_item_thumbnails/8756.jpg)
Reviews
The best overviews of the literature on this topic
Vindade VC et al. Paediatr Drugs 2021.
![[Image]](content_item_thumbnails/pubmed.jpg)
Levy DM and Kamphuis S. Pediatric Clinics of North America 2012.
![[Image]](content_item_thumbnails/8762.jpg)
Guidelines
The current guidelines from the major specialty associations in the field
Fanouriakis A et al. Ann Rheum Dis 2020.
![[Image]](content_item_thumbnails/713.jpg)
Fanouriakis A et al. Ann Rheum Dis 2019.
![[Image]](content_item_thumbnails/736.jpg)
Bajema IM et al. Kidney Int 2018.
![[Image]](content_item_thumbnails/8769.jpg)
Groot N et al. Ann Rheum Dis 2017.
![[Image]](content_item_thumbnails/8765.jpg)
Mina R et al. Arthrit Care Res 2011.
![[Image]](content_item_thumbnails/40508.jpg)
Hochberg MC. Arthritis Rheum 1997.
![[Image]](content_item_thumbnails/8768.jpg)