Resident 360 Study Plans on AMBOSS
Find all Resident 360 study plans on AMBOSS
Fast Facts
A brief refresher with useful tables, figures, and research summaries
Newborn Screening
The newborn screen is sometimes referred to as the newborn blood-spot screen because it involves blotting a small amount of each newborn’s blood onto a piece of filter paper that is sent to a government lab. This public health initiative screens for treatable genetic conditions at day 1 or 2 after birth. The goal of newborn screening is to diagnose these conditions and initiate treatment before irreversible health effects occur.
The specific diseases included in the newborn screen vary by state and country, and some countries may not perform the screening at all. For information on conditions screened by state, see the Newborn Screening Clearinghouse. Conditions that are screened in the United States fall into the following categories:
Category | Disorders |
---|---|
Metabolic | Urea cycle disorders Amino acid disorders Organic acid disorders Fatty acid oxidation disorders Galactosemia Biotinidase deficiency Storage disorders (recently added; screening exists for only a few) |
Endocrine | Congenital hypothyroidism Congenital adrenal hyperplasia |
Hematologic | Sickle cell disease Thalassemia |
Pulmonary | Cystic fibrosis |
Immunologic | Severe combined immunodeficiency (SCID) |
It is important to be aware of certain disorders that are not presently screened for in newborns so that a normal newborn screening test result doesn’t dissuade you from considering such conditions in the differential diagnosis for a sick child.
Some diseases that are not currently included in the newborn screen:
glycogen storage disorders
metabolic disorders detectable in the cerebrospinal fluid (CSF) but not the blood
mitochondrial disorders
most lysosomal storage disorders
A positive newborn screen prompts a notification from the newborn screening lab to the pediatrician, who then refers the family to a specialist (e.g., metabolic geneticist, hematologist). Like all screening tests, sensitivity is valued more than specificity so as not to miss any affected infants. This, coupled with the low pretest probability of any one of these rare conditions, means that false-positive results occur. The specialist will order subsequent lab tests, as well as repeat newborn screening, to determine whether a child is in fact affected, and if so, to identify the specific disorder.
Newborn screening does occasionally fail to diagnose a child. Thus, if there is a clinical suspicion for a condition in a child who had normal newborn screening, consider that a false-negative screen might have occurred.
For information on newborn screening and immunodeficiency, see Immunodeficiency in the Pediatric Allergy/Immunology rotation guide.
For more information on newborn screening, see Prevention and Screening in Preventive/Well Child rotation guide.
Research
Landmark clinical trials and other important studies
Adhikari AN et al. Nat Med 2020.
Found whole exome sequencing alone to be insufficiency sensitive or specific for most newborn screen inborn errors of metabolism, but found that as a second tier test for infants with abnormal multiple spectroscopy results it could reduce false-positive results, decrease the time to diagnosis, and in some cases suggest a more appropriate or specific diagnosis than was initially obtained
![[Image]](content_item_thumbnails/gim2015111.jpg)
Bodian DL et al. Genet Med 2016.
A proof-of-concept study using whole-genome sequencing to detect mutations in genes for conditions on the newborn screen
![[Image]](content_item_thumbnails/10.1038_gim.2015.111.jpg)
Comeau AM et al. Pediatrics 2004.
A demonstration of a two-tier approach to newborn screening for cystic fibrosis
![[Image]](content_item_thumbnails/peds.113.6.1573.jpg)
Wilcken B et al. N Engl J Med 2003.
Prospective study of tandem mass spectrometry demonstrating its power to detect inborn errors of metabolism
![[Image]](content_item_thumbnails/NEJMoa025225.jpg)
Farrell PM et al. N Engl J Med 1997.
Retrospective analysis showing that early diagnosis of cystic fibrosis via the newborn screen prevents malnutrition
![[Image]](content_item_thumbnails/nejm199710023371403_f1.jpg)
Garrick MD et al. N Engl J Med 1973.
Proof-of-concept article suggesting that hemoglobin disorders can be identified via newborn screening
![[Image]](content_item_thumbnails/nejm197306142882403_f1.jpg)
Guthrie R and Susi A. Pediatrics 1963.
A pilot study suggesting it is possible to inexpensively screen a large number of newborns for phenylketonuria with a low false-positive rate
![[Image]](content_item_thumbnails/peds.32.3.338.jpg)
Reviews
The best overviews of the literature on this topic
Kingsmore SF. Genet Med 2016.
![[Image]](content_item_thumbnails/gim.2015.172.jpg)
Almannai M et al. Curr Opinion in Pediatrics 2016.
![[Image]](content_item_thumbnails/MOP.0000000000000414.jpg)
Guidelines
The current guidelines from the major specialty associations in the field
Friedman JM et al. BMC Med Genomics 2017.
![[Image]](content_item_thumbnails/s12920-017-0247-4.jpg)
Calonge N et al. Genet Med 2010.
![[Image]](content_item_thumbnails/GIM.0b013e3181d2af04.jpg)
Watson MS et al. Pediatrics 2006.
![[Image]](content_item_thumbnails/peds.2005-2633I.jpg)
Additional Resources
Videos, cases, and other links for more interactive learning
American College of Medical Genetics and Genomics 2023.
![[Image]](content_item_thumbnails/14023.jpg)
![[Image]](content_item_thumbnails/Newenglandconsortium.jpg)
U.S. Department of Health and Human Services 2023.
![[Image]](content_item_thumbnails/hrsa.jpg)
Genetic Alliance 2023.
![[Image]](content_item_thumbnails/4514.jpg)