Resident 360 Study Plans on AMBOSS
Find all Resident 360 study plans on AMBOSS
Fast Facts
A brief refresher with useful tables, figures, and research summaries
Genetic Variants and Testing
Some genetic conditions can be diagnosed clinically. However, when possible, confirmation of such entities with molecular diagnostics is ideal. This means identifying the DNA variant(s) causing the disease.
A “variant” refers to a DNA sequence that differs from the reference human genome. Adjectives are added before a variant to express the likelihood of the DNA change to be disease-causing:
benign variant: very unlikely to cause disease
pathogenic variant (or “mutation”): very likely to be disease-causing
variants of uncertain significance (VUS): not enough is known to determine whether these are disease-causing
No single genetic test can identify all types of potentially pathogenic genetic variation. Therefore, it’s important to order the right test based on the genetic diagnosis you are considering. For example, if you are strongly considering Turner syndrome (45, X), only tests that can identify whole-chromosome anomalies (aneuploidies) are appropriate.
Type of Variant | Description of Category |
---|---|
Aneuploidy | An abnormal number of chromosomes in each cell (e.g., 45 or 47 chromosomes instead of 46) |
Translocation | A piece of a chromosome has moved from its original location and has become attached to another chromosome; a translocation may disrupt a gene |
Deletion, duplication, copy number variant (CNV) | Part of a chromosome (tens to millions of nucleotides) is missing or extra |
Point mutation, single nucleotide variant (SNV) | Change in a single nucleotide |
Insertion-deletion (indel) | A few nucleotides are inserted and/or deleted, which may alter the protein-coding sequencing after the change Can include in-frame deletions or frameshift variants |
Triplet (trinucleotide) or other polynucleotide repeat expansion | Three nucleotides (or other repeat length) are repeated too many times |
Epimutation | Change to molecules covalently attached to DNA, without changing the DNA sequence itself (e.g., methylation); such changes are epigenetic |
The following table lists the genetic tests used in clinical genetics and the types of mutations they detect. Note that karyotypes, microarrays, whole-exome sequencing, and whole-genome sequencing are genome-wide analyses that can be used as screening tests when you suspect the presence of a genetic condition but are uncertain about what it might be.
Type of Test | Description | Type of Variants the Test Can Detect |
---|---|---|
Karyotype | Picture of chromosomes taken under a light microscope | Triploidy (69 chromosomes instead of 46) Aneuploidy Translocation Deletion/duplication (large only) |
Chromosomal microarray analysis (CMA)* |
A high-resolution karyotype that uses lasers and a computer instead of a microscope Two varieties: oligonucleotide and single nucleotide polymorphism (SNP) |
Aneuploidy Deletion/duplication Absence of heterozygosity (only with SNP array) |
Fluorescence in situ hybridization (FISH) |
A fluorescent probe targeted to a specific section of a chromosome counts how many copies of that section are in a cell |
Aneuploidy Deletion/duplication Translocation |
Polymerase chain reaction (PCR) |
A specific stretch of DNA is amplified to determine its presence or size |
Deletion/duplication Triplet repeat expansion |
Southern blot | A specific stretch of DNA is isolated to determine if that genomic region is present or its size |
Deletion/duplication Triplet repeat expansion (rarely in clinical use at this time) |
Multiplex ligation- dependent probe amplification (MLPA) |
A special PCR test that measures the number of copies of a section of DNA that are present |
Deletion/duplication |
Gene sequencing | Checks the sequence of a gene for variants |
Point mutation Indel |
Methylation assay | Ascertains methylation status of a gene |
Epimutation DNA mutations in genes encoding epigenetic regulators or in imprinting control centers |
Methylation array** | Ascertains methylation status of multiple regions of the genome |
Epimutations DNA mutations in genes encoding epigenetic regulators or in imprinting control centers |
Panel test | Simultaneously examines multiple disease genes for related phenotypes |
Point mutation Indel Deletion/duplication |
Whole-exome sequencing*** |
The coding sequence of every gene is checked for variants |
Point mutation Indel Deletion/duplication |
Whole-genome sequencing** |
The sequence of the entire genome (coding and noncoding) is checked for errors |
Point mutation Indel Deletion/duplication |
RNA sequencing** |
Ascertains the sequence of mRNA | Suggest defects in gene splicing or gene expressions |
Other tests that do not specifically look at DNA are also used to confirm diagnoses. Examples include enzyme assays for biochemical disorders and protein studies for disorders of collagen.
Secondary Findings
When whole exome sequencing or whole genome sequencing is undertaken, patients and families have the opportunity to learn about secondary findings. Secondary findings are mutations identified in one of 81 genes, selected by the American College of Medical Genetics and Genomics, that may be unrelated to the patient's presentation and reason for testing, but are thought to be medically actionable. Examples include BRCA1, when identification of a mutation may lead to high-risk cancer screening, or FBN1, when identification of a mutation may lead to cardiology and ophthalmology evaluations. For secondary findings, only pathogenic variants are reported; variants of unknown significance are not.
Research
Landmark clinical trials and other important studies
Stevens Smith H et al. Genet Med 2020.
In this retrospective cohort study, the utility of exome sequencing is compared to that of standard genetic testing in critically ill infants and is found to have higher yield as a single test, although it does not lead to overall improved diagnostic yield or patient survival.
![[Image]](content_item_thumbnails/s41436-020-0798-1.jpg)
Liu P et al. N Engl J Med 2019.
A laboratory going back to its previous whole exome sequencing reports and updating them with current knowledge of disease genes and variants can make new diagnoses and clarify others.
![[Image]](content_item_thumbnails/14019.jpg)
Aref-Eshghi E et al. Am J Hum Genet 2019.
A methylation array enables the diagnosis of epigenetic disorders.
![[Image]](content_item_thumbnails/14018.jpg)
Gil MM et al. Ultrasound Obstet Gynecol 2015.
Meta-analysis demonstrating that cell-free fetal DNA analysis of maternal blood is a high-sensitivity and high-specificity method for identifying trisomies 13, 18, and 21
![[Image]](content_item_thumbnails/uog.14791.jpg)
Moeschler JB et al. Pediatrics 2014.
![[Image]](content_item_thumbnails/14020.jpg)
Yang Y et al. N Engl J Med 2013.
The first publication of a large cohort of patients analyzed by clinical whole-exome sequencing, demonstrating a diagnosis rate of approximately 25% and a few patients with two separate mendelian disorders
![[Image]](content_item_thumbnails/4488.jpg)
Saunders CJ et al. Sci Transl Med 2012.
Prospective clinical trial showing that whole-genome sequencing can make clinically actionable diagnoses on newborns in about 2 days
![[Image]](content_item_thumbnails/scitranslmed.3004041.jpg)
Coulter ME et al. Genet Med 2011.
Retrospective chart review in which 13.1% of chromosomal microarray results were clinically actionable
![[Image]](content_item_thumbnails/gim2011129.jpg)
Reviews
The best overviews of the literature on this topic
Martin CL and Ledbetter DH. JAMA 2017.
![[Image]](content_item_thumbnails/4491.png)
Schaaf CP et al. Annu Rev Genomics Hum Genet 2011.
![[Image]](content_item_thumbnails/annurev-genom-092010-110715.jpg)
Guidelines
The current guidelines from the major specialty associations in the field
Miller DT et al. Genet Med 2023.
![[Image]](content_item_thumbnails/S1098-3600(23)00879-1.jpg)
Srivastava S et al. Genet Med 2019.
![[Image]](content_item_thumbnails/14021.jpg)
Kalia SS et al. Genet Med 2017.
![[Image]](content_item_thumbnails/39540.jpg)
Miller DT et al. Am J Hum Genet 2010.
![[Image]](content_item_thumbnails/S0002-9297(10)00208-9.jpg)
Additional Resources
Videos, cases, and other links for more interactive learning
National Institute of Health
![[Image]](content_item_thumbnails/pubmed.jpg)
University of California Santa Cruz 2020-22.
![[Image]](content_item_thumbnails/genome_browser.jpg)