Resident 360 Study Plans on AMBOSS
Find all Resident 360 study plans on AMBOSS
Fast Facts
A brief refresher with useful tables, figures, and research summaries
Systemic Lupus Erythematosus
Systemic lupus erythematosus (SLE) is a systemic autoimmune disorder with varied manifestations and severity. It most commonly occurs in women during their childbearing years and in Black, Hispanic, and Asian people more frequently and severely than in white people.
The pathogenesis of SLE involves direct effects of autoantibodies (e.g., Coombs-positive hemolytic anemia) and through immune complex deposition in various tissues, which triggers an inflammatory response (e.g., glomerulonephritis).
Clinical Manifestations
SLE is notable for its heterogeneity — patients can have SLE with different manifestations, including:
-
mucocutaneous involvement
-
numerous rashes, most of which are photosensitive; not all patients with cutaneous lupus develop systemic lupus
acute cutaneous lupus: characteristic malar or butterfly rash, but can also be generalized (nearly all patients with acute cutaneous lupus will have SLE)
subacute cutaneous lupus: psoriasiform plaques or annular/polycyclic plaques with central clearing (all usually nonscarring; about 50% will have SLE)
chronic cutaneous lupus: most commonly discoid plaques (discoid lupus), which heal with scarring, and localized alopecia (about 5-25% will have SLE)
Examples of Malar Rashes in Women with Systemic Lupus Erythematosus (Source: Malar Rash. N Engl J Med 2021.)
-
musculoskeletal involvement
nonerosive inflammatory polyarthralgia or polyarthritis is common
myalgia
myositis
Jaccoud arthropathy, characterized by rheumatoid arthritis (RA)-like joint-alignment abnormalities that are reducible (unlike in RA) and not associated with bony erosions
-
kidney involvement
lupus nephritis (see the 2018 Revision of the International Society of Nephrology/Renal Pathology Society classification of lupus nephritis)
renal artery or vein thrombosis in patients with a hypercoagulable state (may be associated with antiphospholipid antibodies or nephrotic syndrome)
-
neuropsychiatric involvement
headache
cognitive dysfunction
mood disorder
transverse myelitis
cerebral vasculitis
peripheral neuropathy
seizure
-
cardiovascular involvement
pericarditis (often asymptomatic)
myocarditis
valvular abnormalities (e.g., Libman-Sacks [nonbacterial] endocarditis)
increased risk of ischemic heart disease
-
pulmonary
pleurisy/pleural effusions
interstitial lung disease
acute lupus pneumonitis
diffuse alveolar hemorrhage (rare)
shrinking lung syndrome (pleuritic chest pain, shortness of breath, and progressive decrease in lung volume)
-
hematologic involvement
anemia, leukopenia, thrombocytopenia
hypercoagulability and antiphospholipid antibody syndrome (APLS)
-
gastrointestinal involvement
esophageal dysmotility
sterile peritonitis
mesenteric vasculitis
mesenteric thrombosis (in patients with APLS)
autoimmune hepatitis
Diagnosis
Diagnosis of SLE is dependent on both the characteristics listed above and the following investigations:
laboratory studies, including complement components (C3, C4), coagulation studies with lupus anticoagulant, direct antigen test, and urine albumin or protein analysis
-
tests for autoantibodies
antinuclear antibody (ANA) — highly sensitive (99%) for SLE
antibodies to Smith antigen and double-stranded DNA (dsDNA) — specific for SLE, but not sensitive
antibodies to Ro, La, and ribonucleoprotein (RNP) — not specific for SLE but if present markedly increase the chances of SLE or other ANA-associated autoimmune rheumatic disease, such as Sjögren syndrome or mixed connective tissue disease
antiphospholipid antibodies (anticardiolipin, anti-beta 2-glycoprotein 1, lupus anticoagulant)
Of the antibodies listed above, the only antibody that is known to correlate with disease activity is the anti-dsDNA level, which correlates strongly with lupus nephritis. All other autoantibodies, while important diagnostically, cannot be used to determine disease activity.
Some patients will have serologic evidence of antibody formation and activity (such as hypocomplementemia and polyclonal hypergammaglobulinemia) that may mirror clinically active disease; in such patients, these biomarkers may be useful for monitoring disease activity. In others, these biomarkers are permanently abnormal or normal, and their monitoring utility is less useful. In other patients, there might be no evidence of complement activation or polyclonal antibody formation despite supportive serology for diagnosis. In this last group of patients, it is critical that the symptom description be weighed heavily in determining the degree of disease activity.
Additional investigations are dependent on the manifestations of disease (e.g., transthoracic echocardiography; electrocardiography; imaging of the chest, abdomen, or central nervous system; pulmonary function tests; nerve conduction studies; renal biopsy).
Classification: For decades, researchers used the American College of Rheumatology Criteria for the classification of SLE, which included 11 possible criteria. A patient was considered to have SLE if 4 criteria were positive. In 2012, an expert panel developed revised criteria that required 4 of 17 items be present, but this time at least 1 clinical and 1 immunologic criterion had to be met or the patient had to have lupus nephritis proven by biopsy with a positive ANA or anti-dsDNA test. This Systemic Lupus International Collaborating Clinics Classification (SLICC/ACR) Criteria and a 2019 update represent improved classification schemes. Although classification criteria do not always perform well in clinical practice and should not be strictly followed for diagnosis, they can be quite useful as a guide or starting point when SLE is under consideration.
![[Image]](content_item_media_uploads/r360.i020493_fig002.jpg)
§Additional criteria items within the same domain will not be counted. *Note: In an assay with at least 90% specificity against relevant disease controls (Source: 2019 European League Against Rheumatism/American College of Rheumatology Classification Criteria for Systemic Lupus Erythematosus. Ann Rheum Dis 2019.)
Treatment
Hydroxychloroquine: In general, patients with SLE should be started on hydroxychloroquine (unless allergic, not tolerated, or the patient declines for other reasons). Hydroxychloroquine has been shown to prevent lupus flares, decrease the risk of organ damage, and improve mortality in patients with SLE. It may also provide an antithrombotic effect in patients with antiphospholipid syndrome and may prevent development of neonatal lupus and congenital heart block in infants of mothers with anti-Ro antibodies. Otherwise, treatment is aimed at the active manifestations of the disease.
Additional treatment options include the following and are given based on disease manifestations:
nonsteroidal anti-inflammatory drugs
glucocorticoids
methotrexate (for inflammatory arthritis)
azathioprine
mycophenolate mofetil (MMF) or mycophenolate sodium
calcineurin inhibitors: tacrolimus, voclosporin
cyclophosphamide
B-cell-targeted therapies: rituximab (anti-CD20), belimumab (anti-BlyS)
anifrolumab (a type I interferon blocker and newer agent that may be useful in patients with skin and joint disease)
The following figure summarizes commonly used medications for treatment of SLE:
![[Image]](content_item_media_uploads/r360.i020493_fig003.jpg)
(Source: 2019 Update of the EULAR Recommendations for the Management of Systemic Lupus Erythematosus. Ann Rheum Dis 2019.)
Note: Belimumab is approved for intravenous or subcutaneous injection.
Research
Landmark clinical trials and other important studies
Morand EF et al. for the TULIP-2 Trial Investigators. N Engl J Med 2020.
Monthly administration of anifrolumab resulted in a higher percentage of patients with a response (as defined by a composite end point) at week 52 than did placebo, in contrast to the findings of a similar phase 3 trial involving patients with SLE that had a different primary end point. The frequency of herpes zoster was higher with anifrolumab than with placebo.
![[Image]](content_item_thumbnails/r360.i020493_res1.jpg)
Furie R et al. N Engl J Med 2020.
In this trial involving patients with active lupus nephritis, more patients who received belimumab plus standard therapy had a primary efficacy renal response than those who received standard therapy alone.
![[Image]](content_item_thumbnails/r360.i020493_res2.jpg)
Rovin BH et al. Kidney Int 2019.
The addition of low-dose voclosporin to mycophenolate mofetil and glucocorticoids for induction therapy of active lupus nephritis resulted in a superior renal response compared to mycophenolate mofetil and glucocorticoids alone, but higher rates of adverse events including death were observed.
![[Image]](content_item_thumbnails/r360.i020493_res3.jpg)
Dooley MA et al. for the ALMS Group. N Engl J Med 2011.
This randomized trial showed that mycophenolate is superior to azathioprine for maintenance therapy of lupus nephritis in patients who respond to induction therapy.
![[Image]](content_item_thumbnails/r360.i020493_res4.jpg)
Furie R et al for the BLISS-76 Study Group. Arthritis Rheum 2011.
This phase-3 randomized trial showed improvement in SLE with belimumab, compared to placebo, in patients with SLE.
![[Image]](content_item_thumbnails/r360.i020493_res5.jpg)
Ruiz-Irastorza G et al. Ann Rheum Dis 2010.
A systematic review on the efficacy of hydroxychloroquine in SLE
![[Image]](content_item_thumbnails/r360.i020493_res6.jpg)
Reviews
The best overviews of the literature on this topic
Goglin SE and Margaretten ME. N Engl J Med 2021.
![[Image]](content_item_thumbnails/r360.i020493_rev1.jpg)
Durcan L et al. Lancet 2019.
![[Image]](content_item_thumbnails/r360.i020493_rev2.jpg)
Lisnevskaia L et al. Lancet 2014.
![[Image]](content_item_thumbnails/r360.i020493_rev3.png)
Kiriakidou M. Ann Intern Med 2013.
![[Image]](content_item_thumbnails/r360.i020493_rev4.jpg)
Tsokos GC. N Engl J Med 2011.
![[Image]](content_item_thumbnails/r360.i020493_rev5.jpg)
Guidelines
The current guidelines from the major specialty associations in the field
Aringer M et al. Arthritis Rheum 2019.
![[Image]](content_item_thumbnails/r360.i020493_guide1.jpg)
Fanouriakis A et al. Ann Rheum Dis 2019.
European League Against Rheumatism guidelines for the management of SLE
![[Image]](content_item_thumbnails/r360.i020493_guide2.jpg)
Bajema IM et al. Kidney Int 2018.
![[Image]](content_item_thumbnails/r360.i020493_guide3.jpg)
Hahn BH et al. Arthrit Care Res 2012.
![[Image]](content_item_thumbnails/r360.i020493_guide4.jpg)
Kidney Disease: Improving Global Outcomes (KDIGO) Glomerulonephritis Work Group. Kidney Int Suppl 2012.
![[Image]](content_item_thumbnails/r360.i020493_guide5.jpg)
Bertsias GK et al. Ann Rheum Dis 2012.
![[Image]](content_item_thumbnails/r360.i020493_guide6.png)