Resident 360 Study Plans on AMBOSS

Find all Resident 360 study plans on AMBOSS

Fast Facts

A brief refresher with useful tables, figures, and research summaries

Acute Stroke

Strokes are classified as either ischemic (approximately 85% of cases) or hemorrhagic (approximately 15% of cases). Important guidelines from the American Heart Association/American Stroke Association (AHA/ASA) for the care of patients with stroke include the following:

Ischemic Stroke

Ischemic stroke is a cerebrovascular occlusion that causes ischemic neuronal injury. The source of occlusion is typically either embolism or thrombosis. See the AHA/ASA guidelines for the early management of acute ischemic stroke in patients.

Causes

Leading causes:

  • atherosclerosis (of the aortic arch, cervical arteries, large intracranial arteries, and small cerebral vessels)

  • cardioembolism (due to atrial fibrillation, low ejection fraction leading to ventricular thrombus, and “paradoxical” systemic venous embolism through a patent foramen ovale)

Less-common causes:

  • cervical artery dissection

  • endocarditis

  • vasculitis (systemic vs. primary central nervous system)

  • reversible cerebral vasoconstriction syndrome (RCVS, or Call-Fleming syndrome)

  • hypercoagulable states (e.g., systemic malignancy, antiphospholipid antibody syndrome

  • hemolytic-uremic syndrome/thrombotic thrombocytopenic purpura, nephrotic syndrome)

  • global hypoperfusion

  • vascular compression (herniation syndromes)

Workup

When a patient presents with symptoms suggestive of acute ischemic stroke, the primary and urgent goal is to determine whether they can safely receive intravenous (IV) tissue plasminogen activator (tPA) or benefit from other forms of arterial revascularization. Because these interventions are time sensitive, the immediate workup should be focused and efficient and include the following:

  • Neurologic assessment: All patients with suspected ischemic stroke should undergo a careful and focused neurologic assessment and evaluation using the National Institutes of Health Stroke Scale, a standardized physical examination template that quantifies the severity of the deficit.

  • Focused history and physical examination: The purpose of the focused history is to identify absolute and relative contraindications to tPA (see table below for full list). The evaluation should focus on the following:

    • last-seen well time

    • current use of anticoagulant/antiplatelet agents

    • current platelet count and international normalized ratio (INR)

    • previous strokes

    • prior intracranial bleeding or other major bleeding

    • recent surgery

    • current blood pressure

    • NIH Stroke Scale evaluation

  • Noncontrast CT: This is required immediately to distinguish intracerebral hemorrhage from ischemic stroke. CT has high sensitivity for identifying acute intracranial hemorrhage but may not show early ischemic changes during the acute period. If imaging demonstrates hemorrhage, tPA is obviously contraindicated.

  • Other studies (not necessarily during the acute period):

    • MRI: This is highly sensitive for identifying both acute intracranial hemorrhage and acute ischemic changes, but it is slower, more expensive, and more susceptible to motion artifact than CT; MRI may be contraindicated in some patients (e.g., patients with pacemakers or metal implants).

    • vessel imaging: Imaging of the head and neck vessels may be useful to detect areas of stenosis, dissections, or occlusions. Vessel imaging may also guide intervention when intra-arterial therapy is being considered. Options for vessel imaging include CT of the head and neck vessels with arterial contrast (CTA) or magnetic resonance angiogram (MRA), which does not require contrast. Ultrasound of the neck vessels may be useful for assessment of the carotid arteries but does not provide good imaging of the intracranial and posterior neck vessels. In select cases, catheter-based angiography is performed.

    • echocardiogram: When a cardioembolic source is suspected, transthoracic echocardiography is performed to evaluate for vegetation, mural thrombus, and presence of patent foramen ovale. Transesophageal echocardiography is performed when atrial appendage clot is suspected.

    • heart rhythm monitoring: Ambulatory noninvasive electrocardiogram (ECG) monitoring is often recommended after discharge if a cause of stroke has not been identified; some studies suggest up to 16% of patients have newly detected atrial fibrillation detected only by Holter monitor.

  • additional workup: Young patients or patients without apparent risk factors warrant additional workup for unusual causes of stroke, including evaluation for a hypercoagulable state.

Treatment

The purpose of acute treatment in ischemic stroke is to salvage viable tissue and to improve brain function. Initial stroke symptoms reflect the area of core infarction in addition to surrounding tissue with low perfusion (penumbra). This area of low perfusion surrounding the core area of infarction can be preserved if reperfusion is achieved rapidly. Otherwise, the area eventually becomes incorporated into the area of infarct. Therefore, revascularization interventions (e.g., tPA), when indicated, should be attempted as soon as safely possible.

Progression over Time of Reversible Ischemic Penumbra Volume to the Irreversible Infarct Core
[Image]

(Source: Acute Ischemic Stroke. N Engl J Med 2007.)

tPA revascularization: Before giving tPA, a CT scan must be obtained to rule out hemorrhage. The time-sensitive decision regarding the use of tPA does not depend on MRI; CT is sufficient to rule out hemorrhage. If a patient presents early with no contraindications to therapy, IV tPA may be given to try to dissolve the clot.

  • The Food and Drug Administration (FDA) has approved use of tPA within 3 hours after the stroke event.

  • In contrast, AHA/ASA guidelines extend treatment beyond 4.5 hours in selected patients, based on results of a placebo-controlled study. In this study, treatment with IV alteplase in patients with an unknown time of stroke onset, acute stroke symptoms, and MRI features suggestive of recent cerebral infarction resulted in a higher likelihood of no or minimal neurologic deficit at 90 days.

  • The benefit of tPA decreases and the risk increases with time, such that the earlier tPA is administered, the higher the likelihood of a positive neurologic outcome (“time is brain”). It is important to understand and inquire about potential contraindications before administering tPA.

  • The following risk-benefit statistics are important to share with patients and family members when counseling about tPA therapy:

    • benefit: absolute increase of 11-13 percentage points in the odds of neurologic improvements at 90 days

    • risk: 6% risk for intracerebral hemorrhage, possibly causing neurologic deterioration or death

Inclusion and Exclusion Criteria for IV tPA Therapy in Patients with Acute Ischemic Stroke
[Image]

(Source: Intravenous Thrombolytic Therapy for Acute Ischemic Stroke. N Engl J Med 2011.)

Intra-arterial mechanical thrombectomy: Current evidence supports the use of intra-arterial mechanical thrombectomy (with a stent-retriever device) in patients with proximal large-vessel occlusions of the anterior circulation (intracranial internal carotid, middle cerebral, anterior cerebral) who present within 6 hours after their last-seen well time. Mechanical thrombectomy within 6 to 16 hours of onset or last-seen well time is also recommended in selected patients with acute ischemic stroke who have large-vessel occlusion and other eligibility criteria.

  • Visualization of the cerebral vessels is required, either by CT angiography, MRA, or digital subtraction angiography.

  • Mechanical thrombectomy should only be performed at stroke centers with experienced operators. Consideration of mechanical thrombectomy should not delay or influence the decision to give IV tPA (per AHA/ASA guidelines). Mechanical thrombectomy can follow IV tPA administration.

Complications of Acute Ischemic Stroke

  • hemorrhagic transformation of the infarct bed (bleeding into the friable, newly infarcted tissue)

  • malignant cerebral edema (swelling of the infarcted tissue): When severe, this can cause shifting and herniation of the brain. Suboccipital craniotomy (for large posterior-fossa infarcts) and decompressive hemicraniectomy (for large middle-cerebral-artery infarcts) can be considered.

  • Depending on the etiology, appropriate secondary-stroke prevention can be chosen (e.g., aspirin, anticoagulation, blood-pressure [BP] control, lipid-lowering agents).

Secondary Prevention of Ischemic Stroke

Recommendations for prevention of secondary stroke depend on the etiology of the initial ischemic stroke or transient ischemic attack. The AHA/ASA guidelines for secondary prevention of stroke recommend a diagnostic workup focused on determining the etiology (if possible) and management strategies based on risk factors.

  • Management of vascular risk factors: In addition to diagnosing and treating symptomatic carotid stenosis and atrial fibrillation, it is important to diagnose and treat hypertension, diabetes, hyperlipidemia, and etiologies of cardioembolic stroke with specific treatments and indications (e.g., endocarditis, patent foramen ovale in select patients) and systemic diseases that may initially manifest with stroke. Smoking is also an important vascular risk factor.

  • Management of lifestyle risk factors: Smoking cessation as well as promoting a healthy diet (e.g., transition to low-salt and Mediterranean diets) and physical activity are important interventions for secondary prevention.

Strategies of Proven Benefit for Secondary Prevention of Stroke
[Image]

(Source: Secondary Prevention after Ischemic Stroke or Transient Ischemic Attack. N Engl J Med 2012.)

Hemorrhagic Stroke

Fifteen percent of strokes are due to hemorrhagic stroke, either intracerebral hemorrhage (ICH) or subarachnoid hemorrhage (SAH).

Intracerebral Hemorrhage (ICH)

ICH is a neurologic emergency. Causes of ICH include the following:

  • hypertension

  • trauma

  • bleeding diatheses

  • amyloid angiopathy

  • illicit drug use

  • rarer causes (e.g., bleeding into tumors, aneurysm rupture, other vascular malformations)

Workup: The AHA/ASA ICH guidelines recommend workup of patients with ICH focus on the factors summarized in the following table:

Initial History, Physical Examination and Laboratory Workup in Patients with ICH
[Image]

(Source: 2022 Guideline for the Management of Patients with Spontaneous Intracerebral Hemorrhage: A Guideline from the American Heart Association/American Stroke Association. Stroke 2022.)

Management: The AHA/ASA ICH guidelines include the following management recommendations:

  • admission to intensive care unit (ICU) or dedicated stroke unit

  • focused history, physical examination, routine laboratory tests to evaluate for etiology, comorbidities, and risk factors

  • immediate imaging

    • CT or MRI to confirm diagnosis of spontaneous ICH

    • cerebral vascular imaging (e.g., CT angiography, MRA) to assess for aneurysms, vascular malformation, and active extravasation of contrast (this so-called “spot sign” indicates ongoing bleeding that may predict expansion of the hemorrhage).

    • intra-arterial digital subtraction angiography (particularly in the setting of spontaneous intraventricular hemorrhage with no detectable parenchymal hemorrhage) to exclude a macrovascular cause

    • cerebral venography with CTA to assess for macrovascular causes or cerebral venous thromboses (particularly in patients <70 years with lobar spontaneous ICH and patients 45-70 years with deep/posterior fossa without history of hypertension)

  • reversal of coagulopathy (if possible): coagulation agents include vitamin K, fresh frozen plasma (FFP), prothrombin complex concentrates (PCCs), and/or platelets, depending on why the patient is coagulopathic

    • For patients with vitamin K-associated ICH and INR>2.0: To quickly correct INR and limit hematoma expansion, PCCs are preferable to FFP.

    • To prevent later increase in INR, IV vitamin K should be given after coagulation factor replacement

    • IV protamine may be considered to partially reverse anticoagulant effect of low molecular weight heparin and unfractionated heparin.

    • For patients on direct oral anticoagulants (DOACs): If taken within the previous few hours, consider activated charcoal to prevent DOAC absorption.

    • To reverse anticoagulation with dabigatran (a direct thrombin agent) use idarucizumab; if idarucizumab is not available, consider PCCs or hemodialysis.

    • PCCs may be useful for reversal of rivaroxaban and apixaban (factor Xa inhibitors).

    • For patients on aspirin: Unless emergency surgery is planned for spontaneous ICH, platelet transfusions should not be administered due to potential harm.

  • management of hypertension: In the INTERACT2 trial, rates of hematoma growth, death, and major disability did not differ between standard-of-care BP control (<180 mm Hg systolic BP) and intensive management (<140 mm Hg systolic BP), but the intensive-control group had better functional outcomes as measured by the Rankin scale. (See related NEJM JW summary.) In the ATACH-2 trial, treatment of participants with ICH to achieve a target systolic blood pressure of 110 to 139 mm Hg did not result in a lower rate of death or disability than standard reduction to a target of 140 to 179 mm Hg, with no significant between-group difference in the ordinal distribution of the modified Rankin scale score at 3 months.

    • For patients with spontaneous ICH of mild-to-moderate severity and presenting systolic BP (SBP) between 150 and 220 mm Hg and no contraindication to acute BP treatment: Aiming to lower SBP to target of 140 mm Hg with the goal of maintaining SBP between 130 and 150 mmHg is safe and can improve functional outcome; acute lowering to SBP<130 mmHg is potentially harmful.

    • For patients with ICH presenting with SBP >220 mm Hg: Consider aggressive reduction of BP with a continuous IV infusion and frequent BP monitoring.

  • glucose management (avoid both hyper- and hypoglycemia)

  • treatment of fever (may be reasonable based on animal studies, although no conclusive evidence exists from human studies)

  • management of seizures:

    • Treat clinical seizures or electrographic seizures on electroencephalograph (EEG) with antiepileptic drugs.

    • Prophylactic antiepileptic medications are not indicated for ICH without evidence of seizures as they convey no benefit in relation to functional outcomes, long-term seizure control, or mortality. Note: A short course of prophylactic antiepileptic drug therapy is used in patients with subdural hematoma.

  • intracranial pressure (ICP) monitoring: Consider in patients with Glasgow Coma Score (GCS) ≤8, clinical evidence of transtentorial herniation, or intraventricular hemorrhage or hydrocephalus. Cerebral perfusion pressure goal is usually 50-70 mm Hg.

  • minimally invasive hematoma evacuation with endoscopic or sterotactic aspiration with or without thrombolytic use: Consider for patients with supratentorial ICH 20-30 mL in volume with GCS 5-12 to reduce mortality (as compared to medical management alone). Consider minimally evasive hematoma evaluation over conventional craniotomy in this patient subset.

  • referral for neurosurgery: Limited evidence supports surgery for ICH except in the following specific situations:

    • Patients with cerebellar hemorrhage and neurologic deterioration from brain-stem compression, hydrocephalus, or both should undergo surgical removal of hemorrhage as soon as possible (with concomitant administration of hyperosmolar therapy such as mannitol).

    • In deteriorating patients with supratentorial hematoma evacuation, surgery might be lifesaving, but efficacy is not established. The Surgical Treatment for Ischemic Heart Failure (STICH) trial showed no benefit from early decompressive surgery.

    • In patients with supratentorial ICH with coma, midline shift, or elevated ICP refractory to medical management, decompressive craniotomy with or without hematoma evacuation might reduce mortality.

  • other (nonacute) management:

    • prevention of venous thromboembolism: Patients with ICH are at high risk for venous thromboembolism. In nonambulatory patients, intermittent compression boots are recommended on day of diagnosis. In addition, low initiating low-dose unfractionated heparin or low molecular weight heparin prophylaxis at 24-48 hours from ICH onset may be reasonable to consider to balance risks for thrombosis and hematoma expansion. Compression stockings alone are not beneficial for venous thromboembolism prophylaxis.

    • assessment and management of dysphagia: Some patients require feeding tube placement.

Subarachnoid Hemorrhage

The most common cause of subarachnoid hemorrhage (SAH) is aneurysm rupture or trauma. Other causes include vascular malformations.

Presentation: SAH begins abruptly with the primary symptom of a sudden severe headache, classically described as a thunderclap or “the worst headache of my life.” Usually, no important focal neurologic signs appear at presentation unless bleeding occurs into the brain at the same time.

Severe headache may be associated with:

  • brief loss of consciousness

  • seizure

  • nausea

  • vomiting

  • focal neurologic deficit

  • stiff neck

Diagnosis: A patient’s first or worst headache or one that starts abruptly (thunderclap) should trigger suspicion for SAH and prompt workup, including imaging with CT of the head. Lumbar puncture (LP) should be performed in any patient with suspected SAH and negative results on head CT. Misdiagnosis can occur in the absence of the classic signs and symptoms of SAH. The most common incorrect alternative diagnoses are migraine and tension-type headaches.

Diagnostic Algorithm for Subarachnoid Hemorrhage
[Image]

(Source: Aneurysmal Subarachnoid Hemorrhage. N Engl J Med 2006.)

Treatment: In the critical care setting, the main goals of treatment are:

  • prevent rebleeding

  • secure the vascular malformation

  • prevent and manage vasospasm

  • treat other medical and neurologic complications

SAH Treatment Guidelines
[Image]

(Source: Aneurysmal Subarachnoid Hemorrhage. N Engl J Med 2006.)

Repair of Aneurysms That Have Caused Subarachnoid Hemorrhage
[Image]

(Source: Subarachnoid Hemorrhage. N Engl J Med 2017.)

Research

Landmark clinical trials and other important studies

Research

Intravenous Tenecteplase Compared with Alteplase for Acute Ischaemic Stroke in Canada (AcT): A Pragmatic, Multicentre, Open-Label, Registry-Linked, Randomised, Controlled, Non-Inferiority Trial

Menon BK et al. Lancet 2022.

In this pragmatic trial at 22 centers in Canada, patient who could be treated within 4.5 hours after symptom onset were randomized to alteplase or tenecteplasein. Tenecteplase was noninferior to alteplase with no significant differences in rates of symptomatic intracerebral hemorrhage. Endovascular thrombectomy was performed in approximately one-third of all study patients.

Read the NEJM Journal Watch Summary

[Image]
Race-Ethnic Disparities in Rates of Declination of Thrombolysis for Stroke

Mendelson SJ et al. Neurology 2022.

In a study of data from the nationwide Get With The Guidelines-Stroke registry, non-Hispanic Blacks had 21% higher odds of declining tissue plasminogen activator (tPA), as compared to non-Hispanic whites after adjustment for patient- and facility- level factors.

Read the NEJM Journal Watch Summary

[Image]
Acute Ischemic Stroke Interventions in the United States and Racial, Socioeconomic, and Geographic Disparities

de Havenon A et al. Neurology 2021

In a study using data from the National Inpatient Sample from 2016 to 2018, the odds of receiving tPA in Black patients was 18% lower than in white patients and the odds of endovascular treatment was 25% lower. Patients from zip codes with lower median income had 19% lower odds of receiving tPA and 16% lower odds of endovascular treatment than those from zip codes with higher median income.

Read the NEJM Journal Watch Summary

[Image]
Heterogeneity of Treatment Effects in an Analysis of Pooled Individual Patient Data from Randomized Trials of Device Closure of Patent Foramen Ovale After Stroke

Kent DM et al. JAMA 2021.

This study provides useful estimates of which patients are likely to benefit from patent foramen ovale closure and which patients are unlikely to benefit. The overall recurrent-stroke rate is low in this population.

Read the NEJM Journal Watch Summary

[Image]
Association Between Dispatch of Mobile Stroke Units and Functional Outcomes Among Patients with Acute Ischemic Stroke in Berlin

Ebinger M et al. JAMA 2021.

In this trial, dispatch of a mobile stroke unit was associated with lower global disability at 3 months, compared with conventional ambulances alone in patients with out-of-hospital acute ischemic stroke.

Read the NEJM Journal Watch Summary

[Image]
Effect of Endovascular Treatment Alone vs Intravenous Alteplase Plus Endovascular Treatment on Functional Independence in Patients with Acute Ischemic Stroke: The DEVT Randomized Clinical Trial

Zi W et al. JAMA 2021.

In this trial, endovascular treatment alone was noninferior to intravenous alteplase plus endovascular treatment with regard to functional independence in patients with ischemic stroke.

Read the NEJM Journal Watch Summary

[Image]
Effect of Mechanical Thrombectomy Without vs with Intravenous Thrombolysis on Functional Outcome Among Patients with Acute Ischemic Stroke: The SKIP Randomized Clinical Trial

Suzuki K et al. JAMA 2021.

In this noninferiority trial, patients with acute large-vessel occlusion stroke were randomized to receive either mechanical thrombectomy alone or in combination with intravenous thrombolysis. Mechanical thrombectomy alone failed to demonstrate noninferiority with regard to favorable functional outcome.

Read the NEJM Journal Watch Summary

[Image]
Ticagrelor and Aspirin or Aspirin Alone in Acute Ischemic Stroke or TIA

Johnston SC et al. N Engl J Med 2020.

Among patients with a mild-to-moderate acute noncardioembolic ischemic stroke (NIHSS score ≤5) or transient ischemic attack who were not undergoing intravenous or endovascular thrombolysis, the risk of the composite of stroke or death within 30 days was lower with ticagrelor-aspirin than with aspirin alone, but the incidence of disability did not differ significantly between the two groups. Severe bleeding was more frequent with ticagrelor.

Read the NEJM Journal Watch Summary

[Image]
Endovascular Thrombectomy with or without Intravenous Alteplase in Acute Stroke

Yang P et al. N Engl J Med 2020.

In Chinese patients with acute ischemic stroke from large-vessel occlusion, endovascular thrombectomy alone was noninferior with regard to functional outcome, within a 20% margin of confidence, to endovascular thrombectomy preceded by intravenous alteplase administered within 4.5 hours after symptom onset.

Read the NEJM Journal Watch Summary

[Image]
Thrombectomy for Stroke in the Public Health Care System of Brazil

Martins SO. N Engl J Med 2020.

In this randomized trial conducted in the public health care system of Brazil, endovascular treatment within 8 hours after the onset of stroke symptoms in conjunction with standard care resulted in better functional outcomes at 90 days than standard care alone.

Read the NEJM Journal Watch Summary

[Image]
Association of Surgical Hematoma Evacuation vs Conservative Treatment with Functional Outcome in Patients with Cerebellar Intracerebral Hemorrhage

Kurumatsu JB et al. JAMA 2020.

In this meta-analysis of data from four observational studies, surgical hematoma evacuation, compared with conservative treatment, was not associated with improved functional outcomes in patients with cerebellar intracerebral hemorrhage.

[Image]
Tenecteplase versus Alteplase before Thrombectomy for Ischemic Stroke

Campbell BCV et al. N Engl J Med 2018.

Tenecteplase before thrombectomy was associated with a higher incidence of reperfusion and better functional outcome than alteplase among patients with ischemic stroke treated within 4.5 hours after symptom onset.

[Image]
Development and Validation of Outcome Prediction Models for Aneurysmal Subarachnoid Haemorrhage: The SAHIT Multinational Cohort Study

Jaja BNR et al. BMJ 2018.

This cohort study sought to develop and validate prediction tools to estimate outcome of subarachnoid hemorrhage from ruptured intracranial aneurysms.

Read the NEJM Journal Watch Summary

[Image]
Intensive Blood-Pressure Lowering in Patients with Acute Cerebral Hemorrhage

Qureshi A et al for ATACH-2 Trial Investigators. N Engl J Med 2016.

This randomized controlled trial enrolled patients with intracerebral hemorrhage to either target systolic blood pressure of 110-139 mm Hg or 140-179 mm Hg and found no difference in rates of death, disability, or other functional outcomes.

[Image]
A Randomized Trial of Intraarterial Treatment for Acute Ischemic Stroke

Berkhemer OA et al. for the MR CLEAN Investigators. N Engl J Med 2015.

In the MR CLEAN trial, intraarterial thrombolysis was effective and safe in patients with proximal intracranial occlusion who were allowed to receive intravenous thrombolysis prior to randomization. A two year follow-up from the MR. CLEAN trial was published in 2017

Read the NEJM Journal Watch Summary

[Image]
Atrial Fibrillation in Patients with Cryptogenic Stroke

Gladstone DJ et al for EMBRACE Investigators. N Engl J Med 2014.

This RCT assigned patients without known atrial fibrillation who had cryptogenic ischemic stroke or TIA within the previous 6 months to either 30-days of noninvasive ambulatory ECG monitoring or 24-hour monitoring and found that 16.1% of patients in the group who received extended monitoring were found to have atrial fibrillation, compared with 3.2% of the control group.

Read the NEJM Journal Watch Summary

[Image]
Rapid Blood-Pressure Lowering in Patients with Acute Intracerebral Hemorrhage

Anderson CS et al. INTERACT2 Investigators. N Engl J Med 2013.

This study compared intensive blood pressure-lowering treatment (target systolic level of <140 mm Hg within one hour) to guideline-recommended treatment (target systolic level of <180 mm Hg) with the use of agents of the physician's choosing. Rates of death or severe disability did not differ between groups but modified Rankin scores indicated improved functional outcomes with intensive lowering of blood pressure.

Read the NEJM Journal Watch Summary

[Image]
Thrombolysis with Alteplase 3 to 4.5 Hours after Acute Ischemic Stroke

Hacke W et al. for the ECASS Investigators. N Engl J Med 2008.

This study investigated use of thrombolysis with alteplase after the 3-hour window. Compared with placebo, administration of alteplase 3 to 4.5 hours after acute ischemic stroke was associated with improved clinical outcomes as well as an increase in symptomatic intracerebral hemorrhage.

Read the NEJM Journal Watch Summary

[Image]
Tissue Plasminogen Activator for Acute Ischemic Stroke

The National Institute of Neurological Disorders and Stroke rt-PA Stroke Study Group. N Engl J Med 1995.

In this placebo-controlled, double-blind, randomized-controlled trial, tPA administered within 3 hours of acute ischemic stroke was associated with better outcomes at 3 months, despite an increased incidence of symptomatic ICH.

Read the NEJM Journal Watch Summary

[Image]

Reviews

The best overviews of the literature on this topic

Reviews

[Image]
Acute Ischemic Stroke

Powers W. N Engl J Med 2020.

[Image]
Treatment of Acute Ischemic Stroke

Brott T and Bogousslavsky J. N Engl J Med 2020.

[Image]
[Image]
Spontaneous Subarachnoid Haemorrhage

Macdonald RL and Schweizer TA. Lancet 2017.

[Image]
Subarachnoid Hemorrhage

Lawton MT and Vates GE N Engl J Med 2017.

[Image]
Cryptogenic Stroke

Saver J. N Engl J Med 2016.

[Image]

Guidelines

The current guidelines from the major specialty associations in the field

Guidelines

[Image]
[Image]
[Image]
[Image]
[Image]
Wijdicks EFM et al. Stroke 2014.
[Image]

Additional Resources

Videos, cases, and other links for more interactive learning

Additional Resources

Global, Regional, and Country-Specific Lifetime Risks of Stroke, 1990 and 2016

The GBD 2016 Lifetime Risk of Stroke Collaborators. N Engl J Med 2018.

This study calculated the lifetime risk of stroke for different populations on a region, countrywide, and global scale.

[Image]
American Heart Association and American Stroke Association Guidelines Page

This website includes a comprehensive list of medical guidelines and scientific statements published by the AHA and ASA, as well as links to guidelines pocket cards and a smartphone application for AHA/ASA guidelines

[Image]
NIH Stroke Scale

This website includes text and graphical PDFs of the NIH Stroke Scale for clinicians to use at the bedside

[Image]