Resident 360 Study Plans on AMBOSS
Find all Resident 360 study plans on AMBOSS
Fast Facts
A brief refresher with useful tables, figures, and research summaries
Diabetic Foot Infection
Diabetic foot ulcer (DFU) is the most frequently recognized complication of diabetes. Patients with foot ulcers have increased mortality, and more than 50% of ulcers become infected. Infected ulcers can progress to larger wounds, gangrene, and osteomyelitis, and lead to amputations and death. Therefore, it is important to recognize and treat diabetic foot infection (DFI) early and appropriately. In this section, we cover the following topics related to DFI:
Pathophysiology
Diabetes causes neuropathic and vascular changes that lead to ulcer formation, as shown in the figure below.
![[Image]](content_item_media_uploads/nejmra1615439_f1_dnrjmo.jpg)
Diabetic foot ulcers and their recurrences are caused by a number of factors that ultimately lead to skin breakdown. These factors include sequelae related to sensory, autonomic, and motor neuropathies. (Source: Diabetic Foot Ulcers and Their Recurrence. N Engl J Med 2017.)
Diagnosis
Although there are no clear clinical criteria for diagnosing DFI, typically signs of inflammation (e.g., redness, warmth, swelling, pain), purulence, friable or discolored granulation tissue, undermining of wound edges, and foul odor can point to infection.
Risk factors that increase the likelihood of infection include:
positive probe-to-bone (PTB) test
ulcer present for >30 days
recurrent foot ulcers
traumatic foot wound
peripheral arterial disease
lower-extremity amputation
loss of protective sensation
renal insufficiency
walking barefoot
Acute DFIs are classified into three categories:
mild: superficial and limited in size and depth; can be treated with oral antibiotics on an outpatient basis
moderate: deeper or more extensive; may require initial broad-spectrum parenteral agents before transitioning to oral outpatient therapy; hospitalization depends on complicating factors (e.g., peripheral artery disease, poor social support)
severe: accompanied by systemic signs or metabolic derangements; requires hospitalization and initial broad-spectrum parenteral agents
Evaluation: Examine the wound and both feet to inspect for ulcers on the contralateral side and assess pulses or blood flow to the extremities. Probe the infected area with a swab to evaluate depth and extension below the skin surface, especially if the probe reaches bone (positive PTB test). A positive PTB test has a high positive predictive value for concurrent osteomyelitis in patients with ulcers highly suspicious of infection.
Diagnostic tests to consider:
complete blood count, C-reactive protein, and erythrocyte sedimentation rate
blood cultures: generally low-yield even in the setting of osteomyelitis
wound cultures: collect before receipt of antibiotics if possible and from deep tissue; avoid superficial swabs (prone to detecting the colonizing organisms) unless purulent exudate is cultured
vascular studies: a low ankle-brachial index (ABI) can indicate peripheral vascular disease, which may require intervention to improve blood flow for healing
radiography: plain radiograph can identify bony abnormalities (e.g., from chronic osteomyelitis), soft-tissue gas, or foreign bodies
magnetic resonance imaging (MRI): the imaging modality of choice for early acute osteomyelitis; three-phase technetium bone scan and labeled leukocyte scan are alternatives if MRI is contraindicated
bone biopsy: gold standard for diagnosing osteomyelitis; directs antibiotics choice
Treatment
A multidisciplinary team, often involving wound care specialists, podiatrists, primary care physicians or diabetic specialists, and surgeons can improve long-term outcomes and prevent recurrences of DFI.
Proper treatment of DFI requires the following:
adherence to antibiotic regimen
good glycemic control
off-loading of the foot
aggressive wound care
close monitoring of wound healing
Antibiotics: Most infections are polymicrobial with aerobic gram-positive cocci, aerobic gram-negative bacilli, and anaerobes. Empiric treatment selection depends on severity of illness and suspicion for methicillin-resistant Staphylococcus aureus (MRSA) infection (risks include high local prevalence) or Pseudomonas (risks include high local prevalence of Pseudomonas infection, warm climate, frequent foot exposure to water).
The following table of empiric antibiotic regimens suggested in the 2012 Infectious Diseases Society of America (IDSA) guideline can be helpful in decision-making when choosing an agent for treatment. Treatment duration varies (1-3 weeks, depending on severity) and should continue until resolution of findings of infection but not necessarily until healing of ulcer. Antimicrobial susceptibility should be reassessed based on local microbiogram data.
Severity | MRSA | Pseudomonas | Anaerobes | Antibiotic | Notes |
---|---|---|---|---|---|
Mild | No | No | No | Dicloxacillin (PO) Cephalexin (PO) |
Focused on gram-positive organisms |
Yes | No | No | Doxycycline (PO) Trimethoprim-sulfamethoxazole (PO) |
May not have adequate strep activity alone |
|
No | No | Yes | Amoxicillin-clavulanate (PO) | ||
Yes | No | Yes | Clindamycin (PO/IV) | May not have reliable MRSA activity | |
Moderate or Severe | No | No | No | Ceftriaxone (IV/IM) Moxifloxacin (PO/IV) |
Add metronidazole (PO/IV) for anaerobic activity |
No | No | Yes | Cefoxitin (IV) Ampicillin-sulbactam (IV) Ertapenem (IV/IM) |
||
No | Yes | No | Ciprofloxacin (PO/IV) Levofloxacin (PO/IV) Ceftazidime (IV) Cefepime (IV) Aztreonam (IV) |
Add metronidazole (PO/IV) for anaerobic activity | |
Yes | No | No | Linezolid (PO/IV) Vancomycin (IV) Daptomycin (IV) |
Toxicity with >2 weeks use | |
No | Yes | Yes | Piperacillin-tazobactam (IV) Imipenem-cilastatin (IV) Meropenem (IV) |
Surgical intervention may be required in addition to empiric intravenous antibiotics in patients with moderate-to-severe infections to remove necrotic tissue, including infected bone; release compartment pressure; or drain abscesses.
Urgent revascularization may be considered in patients with peripheral artery disease.
Treatment of Osteomyelitis
Treatment of osteomyelitis requires antibiotics that can achieve therapeutic levels in bone tissue. Intravenous antibiotics are not always needed because some oral options have excellent bioavailability. Treatment duration is typically ≥6 weeks but can be shorter if amputation or debridement removed all infected tissue. It’s important to ensure that a patient completes the full course for osteomyelitis because an ulcer will not heal if the underlying bone is still infected.
Revascularization: In cases of vascular ischemia, a surgeon (general or vascular, depending on vascular state of the limb) should be consulted urgently. Most diabetic foot infections will require wound debridement in the operating room or at the bedside.
Prevention
Ulcer recurrence is ~40% within 1 year and ~65% within 5 years. Because many risk factors do not disappear after ulcers heal, it is useful to think of ulcers as being in remission rather than cured. Patients are vulnerable to new ulcers shortly after an existing ulcer heals because the skin is still weak. A false sense that the ulcer problem is gone leads to poor adherence to preventative therapies and is one of the biggest treatment challenges.
Prevention of Ulcers | Treatment of Noninfected Ulcers |
---|---|
|
|
Research
Landmark clinical trials and other important studies
Gariani K et al. Clin Infect Dis 2021
This small, randomized noninferiority trial showed that 3 weeks of antibiotic treatment was noninferior to 6 weeks after surgical debridement of diabetic foot osteomyelitis.
![[Image]](content_item_thumbnails/ciaa1758.jpg)
Lázaro-Martínez JL et al. Diabetes Care 2014.
In this small, randomized, controlled trial comparing early surgical versus medical management of osteomyelitis, the two strategies were associated with similar outcomes, suggesting that a more conservative medical approach is often appropriate.
![[Image]](content_item_thumbnails/pubmed.jpg)
Chakraborti C et al. J Hosp Med 2010.
This meta-analysis found that superficial lower-extremity wound cultures had poor sensitivity for predicting pathogens.
![[Image]](content_item_thumbnails/jhm.688.jpg)
Grayson ML et al. JAMA 1995.
This small study first established the value of the probe-to-bone (PTB) test for diagnosing osteomyelitis in a high-risk population (66% sensitivity and 85% specificity). Subsequent studies have validated a positive likelihood ratio of >4, and one study found that it performed better than signs of infection, radiography, and ulcer culture.
![[Image]](content_item_thumbnails/6790.jpg)
Reviews
The best overviews of the literature on this topic
Armstrong DG. JAMA 2023.
![[Image]](content_item_thumbnails/jama.2023.10578.jpg)
Armstrong DG et al. N Engl J Med 2017.
![[Image]](content_item_thumbnails/6791.jpg)
Dumville JC et al. Cochrane Database Syst Rev 2013.
![[Image]](content_item_thumbnails/6711.jpg)
Guidelines
The current guidelines from the major specialty associations in the field
Schaper NC et al. Diabetes Metab Res Rev 2020.
![[Image]](content_item_thumbnails/54150.jpg)
Lipsky BA et al. Clin Infect Dis 2012.
![[Image]](content_item_thumbnails/6712.jpg)