Resident 360 Study Plans on AMBOSS
Find all Resident 360 study plans on AMBOSS
Fast Facts
A brief refresher with useful tables, figures, and research summaries
Diabetes
Diabetes is a common condition that is managed in both the inpatient and outpatient settings. The two main types of diabetes are type 1 and type 2. Highlighted below are some of the classic characteristics of type 1 and type 2 diabetes. However, these characteristics often overlap, and patients may present with mixed features.
Type 1 Diabetes | Type 2 Diabetes | |
---|---|---|
Etiology | Autoimmune destruction of pancreatic β-cells | Insulin resistance with inadequate compensatory β-cell function |
Insulin levels | Absent or negligible | Typically, higher than normal |
Insulin action | Absent or negligible | Decreased |
Insulin resistance | Not part of syndrome but may be present (e.g., in patients with obesity) | Yes |
Age of onset | Typically, <30 years | Typically, >40 years |
Acute complications |
Ketoacidosis Wasting |
Hyperglycemia (can lead to hyperosmotic seizures and coma) |
Chronic complications |
Neuropathy Retinopathy Nephropathy Peripheral vascular disease Coronary artery disease |
(Same as type 1) |
Pharmacologic interventions | Insulin | Multiple drug classes are available, including insulin |
-
Type 1 diabetes is due to autoimmune beta-cell destruction that leads to absolute insulin deficiency. This includes latent autoimmune diabetes in adults (LADA). The three stages of type 1 diabetes are described in the table below. Patients typically present with symptomatic hyperglycemia (e.g., polyuria, polydipsia, and weight loss) or with diabetic ketoacidosis (DKA), Autoantibodies to insulin, glutamic acid decarboxylase (GAD-65), islet antigen 2 (IA-2), or zinc transporter 8 (ZnT8) can be used to screen for type 1 diabetes.
Staging of Type 1 DiabetesStage 1 Stage 2 Stage 3 Characteristics Autoimmunity
Autoimmunity
Autoimmunity
Normoglycemia
Dysglycemia
Overt hyperglycemia
Presymptomatic
Presymptomatic
Symptomatic
Diagnostic criteria Multiple islet autoantibodies
No IGT or IFG
Islet autoantibodies (usually multiple)
Dysglycemia: IFG and/or IG
FPG 100-125 mg/dL (5.6-6.9 mmol/L)
2-h PG 140-199 mg/dL (7.8-11.0 mmol/L)
A1C 5.7-6.4% (39-47 mmol/mol) or ≥10% increase in A1C
Autoantibodies may become absent
Diabetes by standard criteria
Type 2 diabetes is due to insulin resistance and progressive loss of beta-cell insulin secretion. Onset is usually gradual, with milder forms of hyperglycemia, termed prediabetes, eventually leading to symptomatic hyperglycemia.
-
Other causes of diabetes include:
monogenic diabetes syndromes (presenting as neonatal diabetes or maturity-onset diabetes of the young [MODY])
drug- or chemical-induced diabetes (e.g., steroid-induced diabetes, immune checkpoint inhibitor-induced diabetes, diabetes caused by use of immunosuppressants or HIV medications)
diabetes due to diseases of the exocrine pancreas (e.g., cystic fibrosis, chronic pancreatitis, pancreatectomy)
gestational diabetes mellitus (GDM)
Key concerns in diabetes care include:
screening and diagnosis of prediabetes/diabetes
phenotyping (determining the type of diabetes)
long-term (outpatient) management of blood-glucose levels and glycated hemoglobin (HbA1c)
prevention and management of diabetic complications
management of diabetes in hospitalized patients with infection, acute illness, and varying nutritional status
management of glycemic emergencies (hypoglycemia, hyperglycemia, DKA, and hyperosmolar hyperglycemic nonketotic syndrome [HHS])
Screening and Diagnosis
Screening: Given the high prevalence of impaired glucose tolerance (IGT or prediabetes) and type 2 diabetes, an informal assessment of risk factors or validated tools (e.g., CANRISK diabetes risk calculator) should be considered in the screening of asymptomatic adults at risk of developing diabetes.
The United States Preventive Services Task Force (USPSTF) recommends screening for prediabetes and type 2 diabetes in all adults aged 35 to 70 years who have overweight or obesity.
The American Diabetes Association (ADA) recommendations for diabetes screening in asymptomatic adults are outlined in the following table:
|
Diagnosis: Diagnosis of type 2 diabetes requires two abnormal test results from the same blood sample (e.g., abnormal HbA1c and fasting plasma glucose) or in two separate test samples. If the patient presents with a clear clinical picture of hyperglycemia (e.g., polyuria, polydipsia), then a single abnormal test is sufficient to make the diagnosis. Although continuous glucose monitoring (CGM) has been widely used to monitor glucose in people with established diabetes, currently, the evidence is insufficient to support the use of CGM for screening or diagnosis of prediabetes or diabetes.
The following tests can be used to both screen for and diagnose diabetes:
fasting plasma glucose (FPG)
2-hour plasma glucose concentration during a 75-g oral glucose tolerance test (OGTT)
HbA1c
Thresholds for diagnosis of IGT and type 2 diabetes based on each of these tests are provided in the following table:
Test | Normal | IFG or IGT | Type 2 Diabetes |
---|---|---|---|
Hemoglobin A1c level, % | <5.7 | 5.7-6.4 | ≥6.5 |
Fasting plasma glucose level mmol/L mg/dL |
<5.6 <100 |
5.6-6.9 100-125 |
≥7.0 ≥126 |
OGTT results mmol/L mg/dL |
7.8 <140 |
7.8-11.0 140-199 |
≥11.1 ≥200 |
Phenotyping of diabetes: All patients with new-onset diabetes should be evaluated to determine the type of diabetes. To identify less-common forms of diabetes, the patient should be evaluated for symptoms, medications, family history, and physical examination findings that may suggest genetic or secondary causes of diabetes. Targeted laboratory evaluation can be performed to further evaluate for conditions suspected after this initial clinical assessment.
Patients who present with features most consistent with type 1 diabetes (e.g., before puberty, with DKA, and/or without the typical findings of type 2 diabetes, such as obesity or acanthosis nigricans) should be tested for islet autoantibodies. This typically involves measurements of antibodies directed against glutamic acid decarboxylase 65 (GAD65), the 40K fragment of tyrosine phosphatase (IA2), insulin, and/or zinc transporter 8 (ZnT8). Levels of C-peptide can also be useful.
In older patients with typical features of type 2 diabetes, no additional testing is needed. Autoantibody and C-peptide testing as described above can be helpful in patients with atypical features.
Additional information on screening and diagnosis of both type 1 and type 2 diabetes from the ADA can be found in the American Diabetes Association Standards of Medical Care in Diabetes-2024.
Management of Blood Glucose
Blood-glucose testing: Patients with diabetes should regularly monitor blood glucose concentrations, typically through measurement of capillary blood glucose using lancets and glucometers (i.e., fingerstick glucose measurements). Patients with diabetes should check their blood glucose level when they are unwell or feel symptomatic for hyper- or hypoglycemia. Frequency of blood glucose monitoring depends on the individual patient’s medication regimen (e.g., testing may be omitted in patients who are not taking medications that cause hypoglycemia, while patients requiring insulin may need to test ≥4 times per day).
Continuous glucose monitoring (CGM): Measurement of interstitial fluid glucose levels using CGMs is becoming increasing popular both in patients with type 1 and type 2 diabetes. It is ideal to assess CGM metrics with data accumulated for 14 days of reading for pattern management. Time in range (TIR) is defined as the percentage of readings and time between 70-180 mg/dL (3.9-10.0 mmol/L) and is associated with the risk of microvascular complications and can be used for assessment of glycemic status. The goal TIR is >70% for most adults and >50% in older adults.
Additional information on CGM from the ADA can be found in the American Diabetes Association Standards of Medical Care in Diabetes-2024.
![[Image]](content_item_media_uploads/r360.i008978_fig001.png)
Glycated hemoglobin targets: In patients with diabetes, HbA1c should be tested at least twice annually. In general, the HbA1c target for people with diabetes is <7.0% and ideally around 6.5%. However, goals should be individualized and based on the patient’s age, comorbidities, resources, and risk for hypoglycemia. For example, in an elderly patient with established cardiovascular disease or multiple other comorbidities, the HbA1c target is less stringent (HbA1c of 7.5% to 8.5%) because the risk of harm associated with hypoglycemia outweighs the benefits gained from glycemic control.
General Glycemic Targets for Adults with Diabetes | |
---|---|
A1c | <7.0% (53 mmol/mol) |
Preprandial capillary plasma glucose | 80-130 mg/dL (4.4-7.2 mmol/L) |
Peak postprandial capillary plasma glucose | <180 mg/dL (10.0 mmol/L) |
See Figure 6.2 in the ADA Glycemic Goals and Hypoglycemia: Standards of Medical Care in Diabetes—2024 for an approach to individualization of glycemic targets and factors to consider when setting a specific glycemic target.
Management of Type 1 Diabetes
Because patients with type 1 diabetes have absolute insulin deficiency due to beta-cell destruction and require insulin, omission of insulin places patients with type 1 diabetes at risk of hyperglycemia and diabetic emergencies such as DKA.
Insulin is usually administered via multiple daily injection (MDI) or continuous subcutaneous insulin infusion (CSII) via an insulin pump. Although insulin regimens vary, the primary principles for insulin administration in patients with type 1 diabetes are as follows:
basal insulin to cover baseline metabolic requirements (long-acting insulin analogue such as insulin glargine or via insulin pump)
bolus insulin to cover meal-time carbohydrate intake and prevent postprandial hyperglycemia (short-acting insulin such as insulin aspart)
correctional insulin to bring a high blood glucose level down into the target range
Newer closed-loop systems (“artificial pancreas”) integrate the insulin pump with a continuous glucose monitor (CGM). The system adjusts basal insulin based on real-time glucose levels, but most systems still require manual entry of prandial insulin doses for meal-time coverage.
Noninsulin pharmacologic treatments (e.g., metformin and sodium-glucose cotransporter-2 [SGLT-2] inhibitors) have been investigated in many trials as potential adjuncts for treatment in type 1 diabetes. However, these adjuncts are not approved for use in type 1 diabetes at this time.
Surgery: Pancreas transplantation or islet cell transplantation are two options for management of type 1 diabetes offered to very select patients and should not be considered part of routine care.
Teplizumab is an anti-CD3-antibody that is approved to delay the onset of stage 3 type 1 diabetes in adults and pediatric individuals (aged 8 years and older) with stage 2 type 1 diabetes. However, teplizumab is not used to manage hyperglycemia in type 1 diabetes.
Management of Type 2 Diabetes
The three main approaches to managing diabetes and blood-glucose levels are:
comprehensive lifestyle management
pharmacologic therapy
surgery
Lifestyle management: Lifestyle management is a key component of diabetes management, and all patients diagnosed with diabetes should make lifestyle changes, including the following:
diabetes self-management education and support
nutritional/dietary changes
increase of physical activity and weight loss (when appropriate)
smoking-cessation counseling (when applicable)
psychosocial care
Pharmacologic therapy: Types of pharmacologic treatment for type 2 diabetes include:
oral agents (e.g., metformin, SGLT-2 inhibitors, sulfonylureas, and meglitinides)
injectable agents that are not insulin (e.g., glucagon-like peptide-1 [GLP-1] analogues or glucose-dependent insulinotropic polypeptide (GIP)/GLP-1 receptor agonists.)
insulin
As with glycemic targets, choice of pharmacologic agents should be individualized. Metformin is typically recommended as the first-line agent, with more individualization possible when choosing second-line therapies. For example, an overweight 60-year-old man with heart failure will derive greater benefit from an SGLT-2 inhibitor than a sulfonylurea.
Drug | Mechanism of Action | Efficacy | Hypoglycemia Risk | Effect on Weight | Effect on CVD Risk | Comments |
---|---|---|---|---|---|---|
Oral Agents | ||||||
Metformin | Not fully understood, but primarily by reducing hepatic gluconeogenesis | High | No | Neutral or reduction | Potential benefit for atherosclerotic disease |
GI adverse effects Start at low dose, with gradual up-titration Potential B12 deficiency |
SGLT-2 inhibitor (empagliflozin, dapagliflozin, canagliflozin, ertugliflozin) | Prevents renal tubule glucose reabsorption by inhibiting SGLT-2 activity | Medium | No | Reduction | ↓ CVD risk (atherosclerotic disease and CHF) |
Also has renal benefit ↑ risk of fractures ↑ risk of DKA ↑ risk of amputation (canagliflozin only) |
DPP-4 inhibitor (sitagliptin, linagliptin, saxagliptin, alogliptin, vildagliptin) | Blocks enzyme (DPP-4) that causes breakdown of incretins that stimulate insulin secretion | Medium | No | Neutral | No benefit | ↑ risk of acute pancreatitis |
Sulfonylurea (glipizide, gliclazide, glyburide, glimepiride) | Increases beta-cell insulin secretion | High | ↑ risk in patients with impaired liver or kidney function | Increase | No benefit | Dose reduction needed in elderly due to hypoglycemia risk |
Thiazolidinediones (pioglitazone, rosiglitazone) | Bind to peroxisome proliferator-activated receptor gamma in adipocytes Promotes adipogenesis and lipid availability | High | No | Increase |
Potential ↑ risk of CHF Potential benefit for atherosclerotic disease (pioglitazone) |
Generally reserved as last-line treatment Possible ↑ risk of edema and CHF Uncertain benefit in NASH |
Injectable Agents | ||||||
GLP-1 analogues (dulaglutide, exenatide, liraglutide, semaglutide*) Dual GIP/GLP-1 receptor agonist (tirzepatide) |
Synthetic incretins that stimulate insulin secretion Dual synthetic incretins |
High to very high Very high |
No No |
Reduction Reduction |
Cardiovascular benefit Under investigation |
Uncertain risk of thyroid C-cell tumor GI adverse effects Injection-site reactions Discontinue if pancreatitis is suspected |
Insulin analogues | Synthetic insulin | High | ↑ risk in patients with impaired kidney function | Increase | No benefit |
Surgery: Metabolic surgery is a potential treatment option in patients with type 2 diabetes and BMI ≥40 kg/m2 (BMI ≥37.5 in Asian Americans) and in adults with BMI 35.0-39.9 (32.5-37.4 in Asian Americans) who do not achieve durable weight loss and improvement in comorbidities (including hyperglycemia) with reasonable nonsurgical methods. In the appropriate patient, increasing evidence indicates that metabolic surgery is associated with improved cardiovascular outcomes and sustained glycemic control, compared with lifestyle and pharmacologic treatments alone.
For more information on metabolic surgery, see the Obesity section in this rotation guide.
Diabetic Complications
Diabetic complications can be classified as microvascular and macrovascular disease. Microvascular disease comprises nephropathy, retinopathy, and neuropathy. Macrovascular complications include coronary artery disease, cerebrovascular disease, and peripheral vascular disease.
Management of patients with diabetes requires regular assessment for potential complications and management of cardiovascular risk factors. Due to the autoimmune nature of type 1 diabetes, additional screening should be performed in this patient group for other autoimmune diseases.
Clinical Concern | Examination/Testing | Target | Follow-up | Treatment | Comments |
---|---|---|---|---|---|
Hypertension | Measure BP | ≤120/80 mm Hg | Every clinic visit | First-line: ACE inhibitors or ARBs due to renoprotective effects | Consider 24h BP monitoring |
Overweight/Obesity | Measure weight and height |
BMI: 18.5-24.9 kg/m2 (lower for Asians) |
Every clinic visit |
Target: achieve and maintain >5% weight loss Encourage balanced diet and regular physical activity Pharmacotherapy and metabolic surgery for certain patients |
High-intensity diet, physical and behavioral therapy (>16 sessions in 6 months) aimed to achieve 500-750 kcal/day energy deficit |
Dyslipidemia | Fasting lipids |
LDL cholesterol <100 mg/dL (2.6 mmol/L) OR <70 mg/dL if high cardiac risk Triglycerides <150 mg/dL HDL >40 mg/dL |
At least every 5 years (if no statin therapy) Annually, if treated |
Patients aged <40 years: Commence statin treatment based on previous ASCVD event Patients aged >40 years: Start primary prevention with moderate intensity statin for lower ASCVD risk and high-intensity statin for higher risk Triglyceride-lowering agents (e.g., icosapent ethyl) can be considered in high-risk patients with triglyceride levels ≥150 mg/dL) |
In patients aged >75 years with no history of cardiac event, consider risk-benefit profile of statin therapy |
Lipohypertrophy | Skin exam | No lipohypertrophy | Every clinic visit | Avoid insulin injection into sites of lipohypertrophy | |
Peripheral neuropathy | Comprehensive foot exam | Maintain overall foot health | Annually |
Adequate glycemic control Regular podiatry review if neuropathy present |
Foot exam: inspection, pedal pulses, and sensation (pin prick, vibration, 10-g monofilament) |
Retinopathy | Fundal exam | Maintain vision | Annually |
Adequate glycemic control Consider fibrates with comorbid dyslipidemia |
|
Nephropathy |
UACR eGFR |
UACR <30 mg/gCr Moderately increased albuminuria (microalbuminuria) UACR: 30-299 mg/gCr Severely increased albuminuria (macroalbuminuria) UACR >300 mg/gCr eGFR>90 mL/min/1.73 m2 |
At least annually |
Adequate glycemic control Control blood pressure (ACE inhibitor or ARB) Consider adjunct of SGLT-2 inhibitor in type 2 diabetes |
UACR can be falsely elevated within 24 hours of exercise and with fever, infection, CHF, menstruation, and marked hypertension |
Nonalcoholic steatohepatitis |
Liver-function tests Hepatic transaminases |
Within normal range | At least annually |
Weight loss Glycemic control |
Consider further investigation with liver ultrasound |
Type 1 Diabetes Only | |||||
Other autoimmune disease |
Celiac serology Thyroid function |
Negative Within normal range |
Ask about symptoms annually Test at diagnosis and then periodically thereafter |
Treat individual autoimmune condition | No specific guidelines on frequency of screening |
Hypoglycemia in Diabetes
Hypoglycemia is defined as blood-glucose concentration below 70 mg/dL (<3.9 mmol/L). However, some patients experience symptoms before blood-glucose concentrations are so low. Symptoms can be classified as adrenergic (autonomic; e.g., sweating, shaking, palpitations) or neuroglycopenic (due to alterations in brain function; e.g., hunger, difficulty concentrating, confusion). Common risk factors of hypoglycemia include:
incorrect insulin or long-acting sulfonylurea administration
variation in carbohydrate intake
suppression of glucose production in the liver by alcohol
vigorous or prolonged exercise
intercurrent illness
end-stage kidney disease
cognitive impairment or dementia
socioeconomic issues such as food insecurity or homelessness
Hypoglycemic unawareness occurs when patients no longer experience adrenergic symptoms but directly experience neuroglycopenic symptoms. Usually, neuroglycopenic symptoms occur at a lower blood-glucose concentration. Patients with hypoglycemic unawareness are at risk for more-severe complications. Hypoglycemic unawareness can potentially be corrected by strict avoidance of hypoglycemia for 2 to 3 months.
Treatment:
Nonsevere hypoglycemia (patient is conscious and capable of self-management) can be treated with fast-acting oral glucose (15 g) such as fruit juice or glucose gel.
Severe hypoglycemia (patient is unconscious or unable to perform self-management) needs to be treated with intramuscular (IM) or nasal glucagon and potentially IV glucagon.
All patients should be encouraged to consume sources of long-acting carbohydrates when able and acute hypoglycemia has been corrected.
Review and address risk factors for hypoglycemia to prevent future hypoglycemic events. Consider CGM, which can be helpful for detecting and preventing hypoglycemia, especially those with hypoglycemia unawareness and/or on insulin therapy.
Research
Landmark clinical trials and other important studies
Ramos Eleanor et al. Diabetes Care 2023.
In this study of 217 children and adolescents with newly diagnosed type 1 diabetes, two 12-day courses of teplizumab showed benefit in preservation of beta-cell function.
![[Image]](content_item_thumbnails/r360.i008978_res1.jpg)
Champakanath A et al. Diabetes Care 2022.
In this study of 396 people with type 1 diabetes, HbA1c improvement was observed with CGM regardless of the initiation timing. However, sustained improvement in A1c was significantly better in those who initiated CGM within the first year of diabetes diagnosis compared with CGM initiation after 3 years of type 1 diabetes.
![[Image]](content_item_thumbnails/r360.i008978_res2.jpg)
Rosenstock J et al. Lancet 2021.
In this double-blind placebo-controlled, phase 3 randomized trial, tirzepatide showed robust improvements in HbA1c without increased risk of hypoglycemia in people with type 2 diabetes.
![[Image]](content_item_thumbnails/r360.i008978_res3.jpg)
Frias JP et al. N Engl J Med 2021.
In this open label randomized trial, tirzepatide was superior to semaglutide with respect to mean change in hemoglobin A1C levels in patients with type 2 diabetes.
![[Image]](content_item_thumbnails/r360.i008978_res4.jpg)
Cannon CP et al. N Engl J Med 2020.
In this multicenter double-blind-trial, patients with type 2 diabetes and atherosclerotic cardiovascular disease were randomly assigned to receive 5mg, 15mg of ertugliflozin or placebo twice daily. Among patients with type 2 diabetes and atherosclerotic cardiovascular disease, ertugliflozin was noninferior to placebo with respect to major adverse cardiovascular events.
![[Image]](content_item_thumbnails/r360.i008978_res5.jpg)
Rosenstock J et al. N Engl J Med 2020.
The researchers conducted a 26-week, randomized, double-blind, double-dummy phase 2 trial to investigate the efficacy and safety of once-weekly insulin icodec as compared with once-daily insulin glargine U100 in patients with uncontrolled type 2 diabetes who had not previously received long-term insulin treatment. Once-weekly treatment with insulin icodec had glucose-lowering efficacy and a safety profile similar to those of once-daily insulin glargine U100 in patients with type 2 diabetes.
![[Image]](content_item_thumbnails/r360.i008978_res6.jpg)
Breton MD et al. N Engl J Med 2020.
This randomized open-label trial in children with type 1 diabetes assessed the use of a closed-loop system of insulin delivery as compared to a sensor-augmented insulim pump. The glucose level was in target range for a greater percentage of time with the use of a closed-loop system than with the use of a sensor-augmented insulin pump.
![[Image]](content_item_thumbnails/r360.i008978_res7.jpg)
Yoshino M et al. N Engl J Med 2020.
In this study involving patients with obesity and type 2 diabetes, the metabolic benefits of gastric bypass surgery and diet were similar and were apparently related to weight loss itself, with no evident clinically important effects independent of weight loss.
![[Image]](content_item_thumbnails/r360.i008978_res8.jpg)
Wiviott SD et al. N Engl J Med 2019.
This randomized, controlled trial evaluated cardiovascular outcomes in patients with type 2 diabetes who were treated with dapagliflozin and found that those treated with dapagliflozin had lower rates of cardiovascular death and heart failure hospitalizations.
![[Image]](content_item_thumbnails/r360.i008978_res9.jpg)
Rawshani A et al. N Engl J Med 2018.
Using Swedish registry data, this epidemiologic study evaluated the effects of different risk factors on overall cardiovascular risk.
![[Image]](content_item_thumbnails/r360.i008978_res10.jpg)
ASCEND Study Collaborative Group. N Engl J Med 2018.
This randomized, controlled trial evaluated the benefits and adverse effects of aspirin (100 mg/day) for primary prevention against cardiovascular events in patients with diabetes. The results indicate that although low-dose aspirin reduces cardiovascular events, it is also associated with significantly increased rates of bleeding.
![[Image]](content_item_thumbnails/r360.i008978_res11.jpg)
Zinman B et al. for the EMPA-REG OUTCOME Investigators. N Engl J Med 2015.
This randomized, controlled trial compared empagliflozin, an inhibitor of sodium-glucose cotransporter 2, versus placebo and standard of care for type 2 diabetes. Compared with placebo, empagliflozin was associated with a lower rate of the primary composite cardiovascular outcomes and of death from any cause.
![[Image]](content_item_thumbnails/r360.i008978_res12.jpg)
The NICE-SUGAR Study Investigators. N Engl J Med 2009.
This randomized, controlled trial showed increased mortality in patients randomized to intensive blood glucose control (<110 mg/dl), compared with moderate glucose control (<180 mg/dl), and changed the practice of glucose control in the ICU setting.
![[Image]](content_item_thumbnails/r360.i008978_res13.jpg)
Reviews
The best overviews of the literature on this topic
Phillip M et al. Endocr Rev 2023.
![[Image]](content_item_thumbnails/r360.i008978_rev1.jpg)
Taylor SI et al. JCI 2021.
![[Image]](content_item_thumbnails/r360.i008978_rev2.jpg)
Battelino T et al. Diabetes Care 2019.
![[Image]](content_item_thumbnails/r360.i008978_rev3.jpg)
Armstrong DG et al. N Engl J Med 2017.
![[Image]](content_item_thumbnails/r360.i008978_rev4.jpg)
Palmer BF and Clegg DJ. N Engl J Med 2015.
![[Image]](content_item_thumbnails/r360.i008978_rev5.jpg)
Inzucchi SE. N Engl J Med 2012.
![[Image]](content_item_thumbnails/r360.i008978_rev6.jpg)
Guidelines
The current guidelines from the major specialty associations in the field
American Diabetes Association. Diabetes Care 2024.
![[Image]](content_item_thumbnails/r360.i008978_guide1.jpg)
Endocrine Society. JCEM 2023.
![[Image]](content_item_thumbnails/r360.i008978_guide2.jpg)
Endocrine Society. JCEM 2022.
![[Image]](content_item_thumbnails/r360.i008978_guide3.jpg)
KDIGO. Kidney Int 2022.
![[Image]](content_item_thumbnails/r360.i008978_guide4.jpg)
US Preventive Services Task Force. JAMA 2021
![[Image]](content_item_thumbnails/r360.i008978_guide5.jpg)
Buse et al. Diabetologia 2020.
![[Image]](content_item_thumbnails/r360.i008978_guide6.jpg)
Qaseem A et al. Ann Internal Med 2018.
![[Image]](content_item_thumbnails/r360.i008978_guide7.jpg)
American College of Obstetricians and Gynecologists 2018.
![[Image]](content_item_thumbnails/r360.i008978_guide8.jpg)
Additional Resources
Videos, cases, and other links for more interactive learning
The number of medications available to treat diabetes continues to increase. Recently, there has been widespread interest in two classes of medications, the SGLT2 inhibitors and the GLP1 agonists. They have created quite the splash with improvements in cardiovascular outcomes in patients with type 2 diabetes. In this podcast…
![[Image]](content_item_thumbnails/r360.i008978_ar1.jpg)
Watto M. The Curbsiders 2018.
Interview with Dr. Devan Kansagara summarizing the outcomes of the landmark diabetes trials (ACCORD, ADVANCE, VADT, UKPDS 33 & 34) and answering common questions in diabetes care
![[Image]](content_item_thumbnails/r360.i008978_ar2.jpg)