Resident 360 Study Plans on AMBOSS

Find all Resident 360 study plans on AMBOSS

Fast Facts

A brief refresher with useful tables, figures, and research summaries

Trauma

Trauma is a leading cause of mortality in the U.S. and globally. About half of the patients who die from trauma do so nearly immediately from causes such as massive head injury, high-cervical-spine injury, aortic rupture, and airway complications. One-third of trauma patients die within hours from causes including tension pneumothorax, massive hemothorax, cardiac tamponade, subdural and epidural hematoma, and massive hemorrhage (liver, spleen, pelvic fracture, aortic rupture). Trauma management is focused on systematic identification and intervention to address life-threatening injuries.

The following topics relate to management of trauma in patients:

Advanced Trauma Life Support (ATLS)

ATLS principles provide a framework for the rapid assessment and care of patients with trauma .

Preparation

  • Everyone on the team should know their role prior to the patient’s arrival. Specifically, establish who will be leading the trauma evaluation and resuscitation, who will perform specific assessments, and the priorities for evaluation based on prehospital notification.

  • Wear protective garments (gown, shield, gloves, shoe covers, N95 masks if anticipated intubation).

  • Prepare equipment for intubation, including adjunct airway support devices such as nasopharyngeal or oropharyngeal airways and surgical airway supplies, chest tube, and thoracotomy supplies.

  • Ask for the trauma cooler if massive transfusion is anticipated and notify trauma personnel, as required by the case and your institution policy.

  • As the patient arrives, designated team members obtain vitals and intravenous (IV) access and place monitoring equipment.

  • The leader should stand at the patient’s feet and take emergency medical service (EMS) report; all other team members should also pay attention.

Primary Survey

The primary survey involves a quick assessment for severe bleeding and application of pressure if indicated. The ABCDEs (Airway, Breathing, Circulation, Disability, Exposure) is a systematic approach to the immediate assessment and treatment of patients with trauma.

The ABCDEs of Trauma Care
Primary Survey Focused Evaluation Lifesaving Interventions as Indicated by Physical Exam
Airway
  • Ability to talk

  • Presence of airway obstruction

  • Verify if prehospital intubation is in place

  • Clear airway

  • Intubate

  • Reposition existing airway if needed

Breathing
  • Auscultate

  • Look at chest for respiration rate, depth, and presence of deformities

  • Place on oxygen

  • Perform needle decompression if concern for tension pneumothorax

Circulation
  • Check pulse and sources of hemorrhage (chest, abdomen, pelvis, long bones)

  • Administer fluids and/or blood products

  • Perform FAST* exam

  • Wrap pelvis if unstable

  • Control hemorrhage with direct pressure or tourniquet

  • Decompress cardiac tamponade

Disability
  • Document Glasgow coma score (GCS) or AVPU scale (Alert, Voice, Pain, Unresponsive) and pupils

  • Administer glucose, naloxone, or hypertonic saline

  • Place in neck collar

Exposure
  • Undress

  • Logroll

  • Electrocardiogram (ECG)

  • Chest and pelvis x-ray

Secondary Survey

The secondary survey is a detailed evaluation from head to toe that includes the AMPLE history:

A - Allergies

M - Medications

P - Past medical history

L - Last meal

E - Events (what happened)

During the physical exam, document skin exam for all areas (burns, abrasions, hematomas, puncture wounds, and/or lacerations), as well as the following:

Sequence of the Secondary Trauma Survey
Evaluation High-Yield Evaluation
Head/maxillofacial Note hemotympanum, raccoon eyes, Battle sign, stability of the face, stability of the mandible, septal hematoma, cerebrospinal fluid (CSF) rhinorrhea, eye injury, retrobulbar hematoma, hyphema, foreign body in mouth, oral/dental trauma, pupil reflex and size
Cervical spine Maintain in-line stabilization before opening neck collar
Note carotid bruit, tracheal deviation, subcutaneous emphysema, cervical-spine tenderness to palpation, step-offs, and/or penetrating wounds
Chest Note crepitus, abnormal chest-wall movement, and/or subcutaneous emphysema
Abdomen Note “seat-belt sign,” distention, and/or pain to palpation
Pelvis Do not reexamine if already deemed unstable to prevent further bleed; check genital area; if blood in the meatus do not insert Foley catheter
Extremities Note signs and symptoms of compartment syndrome, pulses, capillary refill time, deformities, and range of movement
Document neurologic, vascular, and motor status distal to any major injury
Neurologic Note GCS (again), strength, and sensation
Back Document rectal tone, spinal tenderness, and/or step-offs

Adjuncts and interventions to the secondary survey (if indicated): Foley catheter, anticoagulation reversal, other indicated imaging, splint application, analgesia, antibiotics, and tetanus-diphtheria-acellular pertussis vaccine (Tdap)

Workup

Blood has likely been drawn after the primary and secondary survey. Crossmatch blood if significant bleeding. Also consider complete blood count (CBC), venous blood gas (VBG), urinalysis (UA), basic metabolic panel (BMP), human chorionic gonadotropin (HCG), toxicologic testing, liver function tests (LFTs), lipase, troponin, prothrombin time/international normalized ratio (PT/INR), and thromboelastogram (TEG).

Clinical Decision Rules for Imaging

Imaging is based on clinical evaluation. The following clinical decision rules are used to minimize the need for imaging:

Clinical Decision Tools for Imaging*
Organ System Useful Clinical Rules for Imaging
Head trauma Canadian CT Head Injury/Trauma Rule
New Orleans/Charity Head Trauma/Injury Rule
NEXUS Head CT Instrument
PECARN Pediatric Head Injury/Trauma Algorithm
Cervical spine NEXUS Criteria for C-Spine Imaging
Canadian C-Spine Rule
Extremities Ottawa Knee Rule
Ottawa Ankle Rule

Massive Transfusion Protocol

If your hospital is a trauma center, it has a massive transfusion protocol (MTP) in place. Massive transfusion is variably defined as replacement of >50% of blood volume in 4 hours (blood volume is ~70 mL/kg in adults) and is predicated based on the concept of balanced transfusion (typically in a ratio of packed red blood cells [pRBC] to fresh frozen plasma [FFP] to platelets of 1:1:1) to avoid dilutional coagulopathy and address potential hypothermia and hypocalcemia.

The criteria for MTP activation and its component benefits and policies are typically institution specific. Decisions to activate MTP typically consider the following:

  • hemodynamic instability

  • rate and expected trajectory of blood loss

  • clinical context (traumatic, gastrointestinal, obstetric, or surgical)

Assessment of Blood Consumption (ABC) Score: Different MTP trigger systems have been studied in civilian and military populations; the ABC Score is often used because it is easily calculated and does not require laboratory studies.

ABC Score for Massive Transfusion
Systolic blood pressure ≤90 mm Hg
Heart rate ≥120 bpm
Positive FAST exam
Penetrating injury

Other MTP scoring systems consider additional variables such as base deficit, INR, hemoglobin, long-bone fracture or complex pelvic fracture, and gender.

Protocols are designed to rapidly allocate blood products to critically ill patients and to prevent, identify, and treat any acute complications of massive transfusion. These include:

  • acute hemolytic transfusion reactions

  • febrile nonhemolytic transfusion reactions

  • transfusion-associated circulatory overload

  • transfusion-related acute lung injury

  • allergic reactions

  • bacterial sepsis

  • hypocalcemia (presenting with tingling, classically perioral or in the extremities, progressing to tetany and, in severe cases, hypotension, cardiac dysfunction, and seizures)

  • hypokalemia, hyperkalemia

  • acidosis

  • hypothermia

  • dilutional coagulopathy

  • dilutional thrombocytopenia

Adjunct treatments for patients with hemorrhagic shock or life-threatening hemorrhage might also include tranexamic acid, fibrinogen supplementation, and/or reversal of anticoagulation or platelet dysfunction after conversation with consultant specialists.

Massive Transfusion Protocol (MTP) Template
[Image]

(Source: Patient Blood Management Guidelines: Module 1 — Critical Bleeding/Massive Transfusion, 2011 Commonwealth of Australia. This work is based on/includes The National Blood Authority’s Patient Blood Management Guideline: Module 1 — Massive Transfusion/Critical Bleeding, which is licensed under the Creative Commons Attribution-NonCommercial-ShareAlike 3.0 Australia license.)

Research

Landmark clinical trials and other important studies

Research

Chest Ultrasonography Versus Supine Chest Radiography for Diagnosis of Pneumothorax in Trauma Patients in the Emergency Department

Chan KK et al. Cochrane Database Syst Rev 2020.

In this review, the authors concluded that the diagnostic accuracy of chest ultrasonography (US) performed by frontline nonradiologist physicians for the diagnosis of pneumothorax in patients with trauma in the emergency department (ED) is superior to supine chest x-ray, independent of the type of trauma, type of chest US operator, or type of chest US probe used.

[Image]
Effects of Tranexamic Acid on Death, Disability, Vascular Occlusive Events and Other Morbidities in Patients with Acute Traumatic Brain Injury (CRASH-3): A Randomised Placebo-Controlled Trial

The CRASH-3 trial collaborators. Lancet 2019.

This randomized, controlled trial showed that tranexamic acid is safe and reduces mortality in patients with mild-to-moderate traumatic brain injury.

Read the NEJM Journal Watch Summary

[Image]
External Validation of Computed Tomography Decision Rules for Minor Head Injury: Prospective, Multicentre Cohort Study in the Netherlands

Folks KA et al. BMJ 2018.

In this study, the application of the CHIP, NOC, CCHR, or NICE decision rules led to a wide variation in CT scanning among patients with minor head injury.

[Image]
Plasma-First Resuscitation to Treat Haemorrhagic Shock During Emergency Ground Transportation in Urban Areas: A Randomized Trial

Moore HB et al. Lancet 2018.

In this trial, during rapid ground rescue to an urban level-1 trauma center, use of prehospital plasma was not associated with survival benefit.

[Image]
Accuracy of PECARN, CATCH, and CHALICE Head Injury Decision Rules in Children: A Prospective Cohort Study

Babl FE et al. Lancet 2017.

In this study, the sensitivities for all three clinical decision rules for head injuries in children were high when applied as intended; however, the PECARN decision tool had the highest sensitivities for both children younger and older than 2 years.

[Image]
The NEXUS Criteria Are Insufficient to Exclude Cervical Spine Fractures in Older Blunt Trauma Patients

Paykin G et al. Injury 2017.

This study concluded that the NEXUS criteria are less sensitive in excluding cervical-spine fractures in older patients with blunt trauma, suggesting that patients older than 65 should still undergo cervical-spine CTs.

[Image]
[Image]
Massive Transfusion Policies at Trauma Centers Participating in the American College of Surgeons Trauma Quality Improvement Program

Camazine MN et al. J Trauma Acute Care Surg 2015.

The results of a cross-sectional electronic survey administered in 2013 of massive transfusion protocols in trauma centers found that most of the participants had massive transfusion protocols to support the damage control resuscitation principles in their institution, with high plasma- and platelet-to-RBC ratios.

[Image]
Transfusion Interventions in Critical Bleeding Requiring Massive Transfusion: A Systematic Review

McQuilten ZK et al. Transfus Med Rev 2015.

This systematic review determined that institutions should develop a massive transfusion protocol that includes the dose, timing, and ratio of blood component therapy for use in trauma.

[Image]
Whole-Body Computed Tomography Is Associated with Decreased Mortality in Blunt Trauma Patients with Moderate-to-Severe Consciousness Disturbance: A Multicenter, Retrospective Study

Kimura A and Tanaka N. J Trauma Acute Care Surg 2013.

This study examined the indications for use of whole-body tomography in high-income countries and concluded that a whole-body CT scan is beneficial in the management of initial trauma in patients with blunt trauma with GCS scores of 3 to 12 for whom head CT is indicated.

Read the NEJM Journal Watch Summary

[Image]
Accuracy of the Canadian C-Spine Rule and NEXUS to Screen for Clinically Important Cervical Spine Injury in Patients Following Blunt Trauma: A Systematic Review

Michaleff ZA et al. Can Med Assoc J 2012.

In this comparison of 15 studies with modest methodologic quality and only one direct comparison, the Canadian C-spine Rule appeared to have better diagnostic accuracy than the NEXUS criteria.

[Image]
Early Prediction of Massive Transfusion in Trauma: Simple as ABC (Assessment of Blood Consumption)?

Nunez TC et al. J Trauma 2009.

The ABC score uses nonlaboratory, nonweighted parameters to identify patients who may need massive transfusion, and the score has been subsequently validated in multicenter studies.

[Image]
A Critical Comparison of Clinical Decision Instruments for Computed Tomographic Scanning in Mild Closed Traumatic Brain Injury in Adolescents and Adults

Stein S et al. Ann Emerg Med 2009.

This analysis of prospective databases compared the sensitivity and specificity of the six clinical decision strategies (the Canadian CT Head Rule, the Neurotraumatology Committee of the World Federation of Neurosurgical Societies, the New Orleans Criteria, the NEXUS-II, the National Institute of Clinical Excellence guideline, and the Scandinavian Neurotrauma Committee guideline). NEXUS II and the Scandinavian clinical decision aids had the best combination of sensitivity and specificity in this patient population.

[Image]
A National Evaluation of the Effect of Trauma-Center Care on Mortality

MacKenzie EJ et al. N Engl J Med 2006.

In this prospective cohort study, the risk of death was significantly lower when care was provided in a trauma center than in a nontrauma center.

Read the NEJM Journal Watch Summary

[Image]
Randomized Controlled Trial of Point-of-Care, Limited Ultrasonography for Trauma in the Emergency Department: The First Sonography Outcomes Assessment Program Trial

Melniker LA et al. Ann Emerg Med 2006.

This study examined the accuracy of focused assessment with sonography (FAST) in clinical decision-making for patients with trauma and is one of the first studies that led to modern standards in the evaluation of patients with trauma. It emphasizes the use of ultrasound for rapid triage of patients with trauma, leading to reduced time, appropriate intervention, shortened hospital stays, and lower costs.

Read the NEJM Journal Watch Summary

[Image]
The Canadian C-Spine Rule for Radiography in Alert and Stable Trauma Patients

Stiell IG et al. JAMA 2001.

The original Canadian C-Spine Rule was developed from this prospective cohort study of clinically important C-spine injury evaluated by plain radiography, computed tomography, and follow-up interview. The decision rule is highly sensitive for use of C-spine radiography in alert and stable patients with trauma.

Read the NEJM Journal Watch Summary

[Image]
Validity of a Set of Clinical Criteria to Rule Out Injury to the Cervical Spine in Patients with Blunt Trauma

Hoffman JR et al. N Engl J Med 2000.

The NEXUS criteria identified patients who need radiography of the cervical spine after blunt trauma.

[Image]
Indications for Computed Tomography in Patients with Minor Head Injury

Haydel MJ et al. N Engl J Med 2000.

This study formed the basis for the New Orleans/Charity Head Trauma/Injury Rule.

Read the NEJM Journal Watch Summary

[Image]
Selective Cervical Spine Radiography in Blunt Trauma: Methodology of the National Emergency X-Radiography Utilization Study (NEXUS)

Hoffman JR et al. Ann Emerg Med 1998.

The original NEXUS study is a prospective multicenter study that defined the sensitivity of clinical criteria for detecting significant cervical-spine injury.

[Image]
Decision Rules for the Use of Radiography in Acute Ankle Injuries: Refinement and Prospective Validation

Shell IG et al. JAMA 1993.

After refinement and validation, the original Ottawa Ankle Rules have been shown to be 100% sensitive in identifying fractures and safely reduce the number of radiographs ordered in patients with ankle injuries by one-third.

Read the NEJM Journal Watch Summary

[Image]

Reviews

The best overviews of the literature on this topic

Reviews

Complications of Massive Transfusion

Sihler KC and Napolitano LM. Chest 2010.

[Image]
Pitfalls in the Evaluation and Resuscitation of the Trauma Patient

Mackersie RC. Emerg Med Clin North Am 2010.

[Image]
[Image]