Resident 360 Study Plans on AMBOSS

Find all Resident 360 study plans on AMBOSS

Fast Facts

A brief refresher with useful tables, figures, and research summaries

Coronary Artery Disease and Acute Coronary Syndrome

Atherosclerotic coronary artery disease (CAD) is a leading cause of mortality and morbidity worldwide. While many patients with CAD are asymptomatic, chest pain is a common presentation. An initial evaluation of chest pain should identify whether the patient is presenting with acute coronary syndrome (ACS), which is an emergency condition characterized by acute myocardial injury (most commonly due to atherosclerotic plaque rupture or plaque erosion followed by thrombus formation).

In this section, we will discuss the diagnosis and management of:

Coronary Artery Disease

Evaluation

All patients who present with chest pain should receive a thorough history and physical examination to determine whether the pain is cardiac related and whether the patient is stable versus unstable. However, a review of the full evaluation of chest pain is beyond the scope of this guide.

Features of chest pain: Typical cardiac chest pain or angina is characterized by retrosternal chest discomfort that is provoked by physical exertion or emotional stress and relieved promptly (i.e., <5 minutes) with rest or nitroglycerin treatment. Other symptoms associated with myocardial ischemia include dyspnea, nausea, epigastric discomfort, presyncope, or syncope. Women, elderly patients, and those with diabetes may present with nonclassic chest-pain qualities, and more attention needs to be paid to these populations.

  • High-risk features: The following table lists features of chest pain presentation suggestive of ACS (discussed below) that necessitates more-urgent evaluation and management.

Short-Term Risk of Death or Nonfatal MI in Patients With UA/NSTEMI
[Image]

(Source: 2012 ACCF/AHA/ACP/AATS/PCNA/SCAI/STS Guideline for the Diagnosis and Management of Patients With Stable Ischemic Heart Disease. J Am Coll Cardiol 2012.)

  • Probable CAD and low-risk features: Patients deemed to have probable CAD and low-risk features should undergo evaluation to determine the severity of CAD and the risk for myocardial infarction (MI) and its complications.

Tests for CAD can be classified as functional or anatomical. Functional tests use a stressor to illicit myocardial oxygen demand-and-supply mismatch, leading to reversible ischemia, which can be detected by electrocardiogram (ECG), imaging, or both. Anatomical tests directly examine for the presence and severity of plaque(s).

  • Functional tests

    • Stressors include exercise on a treadmill or stationary bicycle.

      • Continuous infusion of dobutamine or injection of coronary vasodilators (e.g., regadenoson) can be used in patients who cannot exercise.

    • Imaging modalities include echocardiography, nuclear myocardial perfusion imaging, and less frequently, cardiac magnetic resonance imaging.

      • Imaging is typically required for patients who have baseline ECG findings (e.g., left bundle branch block, ventricular pacing, or resting ST-segment abnormalities, such as ST changes from left ventricular hypertrophy or digoxin use) that interfere with ECG interpretation.

  • Anatomical tests

    • Coronary angiography, the gold standard test for CAD, is associated with procedural risks (e.g., bleeding, infection, MI, or stroke) and may be necessary to guide management (see below) based on findings from other tests.

    • Coronary computed tomography angiography (CCTA) is a noninvasive alternative to angiography but typically requires patients to have a slow-enough heart rate to acquire adequate quality images that are timed to the cardiac cycle.

  • Coronary artery calcium (CAC)

    • For patients at low-to-intermediate risk for CAD, a targeted CT scan can quantify the amount of CAC present, which can identify individuals at low risk for adverse outcomes.

Each test is associated with different sensitivity, specificity, and prognostic values that depend on the patient’s overall clinical likelihood of having CAD. Choosing an appropriate test can avoid false-positive or -negative results. In patients with an established diagnosis of CAD, testing can guide management when symptoms or clinical status change.

Predictors of morbidity and mortality include:

  • maximum exercise capacity

  • ECG changes during exercise

  • amount of cardiac dysfunction detected by imaging

  • severity of coronary stenoses

For more information on choosing cardiac testing, please see the 2021 ACC/AHA guideline for the evaluation and diagnosis of chest pain and the 2014 ACC/AHA guideline for management of stable ischemic heart disease.

Management

In all patients with CAD, the cornerstones of treatment are lifestyle changes and risk-factor management.

Medical therapies include:

  • lipid lowering with statins, ezetimibe, and/or proprotein convertase subtilisin-kexin type 9 (PCSK9) inhibitors; goal for treatment will be tailored based on a patient’s risk for adverse cardiac events. Bempedoic acid, an ATP citrate lyase inhibitor, is a novel LDL cholesterol-lowering medication that can reduce the risk for adverse events.

  • blood pressure control with goal of <130/80 mm Hg; drugs with concurrent indications in CAD are preferred (e.g., beta-blockers, angiotensin-converting-enzyme [ACE] inhibitors, and angiotensin-receptor blockers); of note, beta-blockers can be stopped 3 years after MI or ACS in favor of a more effective drug for blood pressure control if a patient has no other indications for beta-blockers (i.e., ejection fraction [EF] ≤40%)

  • diabetes control with goal hemoglobin A1c (HbA1c) <7% in patients with long life expectancy and goal 7% to 9% in patients with comorbidities

  • low-dose aspirin indefinitely, with clopidogrel (75 mg daily) as an alternative for patients who cannot tolerate aspirin

  • control of chronic stable angina with beta-blockers, calcium-channel blockers, long-acting nitrates, and/or ranolazine

  • annual influenza vaccination

Revascularization: Based on testing, certain patients may have high-risk features that warrant coronary revascularization, either with coronary artery bypass graft (CABG) surgery or percutaneous coronary intervention (PCI). The decision for CABG versus PCI should be made by an interdisciplinary heart team based on the patient’s preferences, comorbidities, and procedural risks. Several clinical trials have shown that routine revascularization in patients with stable CAD does not improve mortality. In general, revascularization should be considered for patients with:

  • ≥50% diameter stenosis in the left main coronary artery

  • ≥70% stenoses in three major coronary arteries

  • unacceptable angina despite maximum medical therapy

After PCI for revascularization of stable coronary disease, patients are typically treated with low-dose aspirin and clopidogrel (i.e., dual antiplatelet therapy [DAPT]) for ≥1 month after bare metal stent (BMS) placement and for ≥6 months after drug-eluting stent (DES) placement. Aspirin can be omitted for patients prescribed anticoagulation treatment (e.g., warfarin or non-vitamin K antagonist oral anticoagulants [NOACs]) for another indication.

Acute Coronary Syndrome

The three types of ACS can be differentiated based on ECG findings and biomarkers (primarily troponin) as follows:

  • STEMI (ST-segment elevation myocardial infarction): ST elevations on ECG with positive biomarkers

  • NSTEMI (non-ST-segment elevation myocardial infarction): no ST elevations on ECG but positive biomarkers and symptoms consistent with acute coronary artery thrombosis (e.g., sudden onset or progressively worsening angina)

  • UA (unstable angina): progressive symptoms of angina, often at rest or with minimal exertion, without ECG changes or positive biomarkers but suggestive of critical coronary artery stenosis an impending MI, or both; an increasingly rare clinical syndrome due to the high sensitivity of troponin assays

Management of Acute STEMI

Immediate PCI or “primary” PCI is the preferred management of acute STEMI (especially in patients who present within 12 hours of symptom onset). The shorter the interval between first medical contact and primary PCI, the better the outcome.

  • An interval of ≤90 minutes is used as a quality measure for hospitals that perform primary PCI. Patients should be transferred to a PCI-capable hospital if time from first medical contact to PCI can be ≤120 minutes.

  • Otherwise, systemic fibrinolytic therapy (e.g., tenecteplase, reteplase, or alteplase) is recommended with subsequent transfer for coronary angiography.

  • Of note, PCI is also recommended for resuscitated patients after a cardiac arrest if the initial ECG is consistent with a STEMI.

Coronary angiography and revascularization:

  • Patients with non-ST-segment elevation-acute coronary syndrome (NSTE-ACS) and high-risk features should also undergo immediate coronary angiography and revascularization, which includes cardiogenic shock, severe heart failure, or structural complications of myocardial infarction (e.g., papillary muscle rupture or ventricular septal defect).

  • Patients with NSTE-ACS not requiring immediate PCI should undergo risk stratification to determine whether catheterization within 24 to 48 hours of admission is appropriate. The Global Registry of Acute Coronary Events (GRACE) risk model and the TIMI risk score are recommended for this purpose; patients with a TIMI risk score >2 benefit from this so-called “early invasive” approach.

The following table lists the factors associated with appropriate selection of early invasive strategy or ischemia-guided strategy:

Factors Associated With Appropriate Selection of Early Invasive Strategy or Ischemia-Guided Strategy in Patients With NSTE-ACS
[Image]

(Source: 2014 AHA/ACC Guideline for the Management of Patients with Non-ST-Elevation Acute Coronary Syndromes, Circulation 2014. Reprinted with permission. ©2014, American Heart Association, Inc.)

Medical management of ACS includes:

  • aspirin (162 to 325 mg, chewed or crushed, given immediately upon initial recognition of potential ACS)

  • antiplatelet therapy with a loading dose of P2Y12-receptor blocker (clopidogrel, prasugrel, or ticagrelor); ticagrelor or prasugrel (contraindicated in patients with prior stroke or transient ischemic attack) is preferred over clopidogrel in the ACS setting

  • heparin or bivalirudin for patients undergoing invasive management; low-molecular-weight heparin or fondaparinux for patients not undergoing invasive management

  • beta-blocker (avoid in patients with signs of acute heart failure, low cardiac output, or both)

  • nitrates for relief of ischemic symptoms

  • morphine for relief of chest pain in STEMI

  • oxygen for patients who are hypoxemic on presentation

Post-ACS management includes:

  • low-dose aspirin: for patients taking oral anticoagulant, DAPT and anticoagulation are typically continued for the first month after ACS before discontinuing aspirin

  • P2Y12-receptor blocker: ≥12 months at maintenance dose to prevent stent thrombosis and recurrent MI; clopidogrel is preferred for patients on concomitant oral anticoagulant; ultimate duration of DAPT may vary based on bleeding risk and type of stent

  • beta-blocker: reduces frequency of ventricular arrythmia, helps with positive left ventricular (LV) remodeling in those with EF ≤40% and improves mortality

  • ACE inhibitor: for patients with anterior infarction, LVEF ≤40%, hypertension, diabetes, or stable chronic kidney disease (CKD) unless contraindicated; angiotensin-receptor blocker (ARB) for patients who cannot tolerate ACE inhibitors secondary to cough or angioedema

  • aldosterone blockade: for patients receiving maximum tolerated therapeutic doses of ACE inhibitor and beta-blocker and have LVEF ≤40%, diabetes mellitus, or heart failure without significant CKD or hyperkalemia

  • high-intensity statin (or other agents mentioned above for CAD management in patients who cannot tolerate statins)

  • nitrites as needed

  • implanted cardioverter-defibrillator (ICD) placement: generally not recommended within 90 days of revascularization or within 40 days of myocardial infarction based on the DINAMIT and IRIS studies

The following table describes recommended routine medical therapies for ACS:

Selected Routine Medical Therapies
[Image]

(Source: 2013 ACCF/AHA Guideline for the Management of ST-Elevation Myocardial Infarction, Circulation 2012. Reprinted with permission. ©2012, American Heart Association, Inc.)

Research

Landmark clinical trials and other important studies

Research

Percutaneous Revascularization for Ischemic Left Ventricular Dysfunction

Perera D et al. for the REVIVED-BCIS2 Investigators. N Engl J Med 2022.

In the Revascularization for Ischemic Ventricular Dysfunction (REVIVED) trial, revascularization by percutaneous coronary intervention (PCI) did not result in a lower incidence of death from any cause or hospitalization for heart failure in patients with severe ischemic left ventricular systolic dysfunction who received optimal medical therapy.

Read the NEJM Journal Watch Summary

[Image]
Initial Invasive or Conservative Strategy for Stable Coronary Disease

Maron DJ et al. for the ISCHEMIA Research Group. N Engl J Med 2020.

The role of percutaneous coronary intervention (PCI) in patients with stable coronary disease has been the subject of controversy. In the International Study of Comparative Health Effectiveness with Medical and Invasive Approaches (ISCHEMIA) trial, patients with stable coronary disease and moderate or severe reversible ischemia on stress testing were randomized to an initial invasive strategy (early PCI) or an initial conservative strategy (medical therapy, with PCI if medical therapy failed). PCI did not reduce the risk of subsequent ischemic events during a median of 3.2 years.

Read the NEJM Journal Watch Summary

[Image]
Five-Year Outcomes after PCI or CABG for Left Main Coronary Disease

Stone GW et al. for the EXCEL Trial Investigators. N Engl J Med 2019.

In the Effectiveness of Left Main Revascularization (EXCEL) trial, there was no significant difference in the rate of the composite outcome of death, stroke, or myocardial infarction at 5 years between percutaneous coronary intervention (PCI) and coronary artery bypass grafting (CABG) in patients with left main coronary artery disease of low or intermediate anatomical complexity.

[Image]
Complete Revascularization with Multivessel PCI for Myocardial Infarction

Mehta SR et al. for the COMPLETE Trial Steering Committee and Investigators. N Engl J Med 2019.

In the Complete versus Culprit-Only Revascularization Strategies to Treat Multivessel Disease after Early PCI for STEMI (COMPLETE) trial, among patients with ST-segment elevation myocardial infarction (STEMI) and multivessel coronary artery disease, complete revascularization was superior to culprit-lesion-only percutaneous coronary intervention (PCI) in reducing the risk of cardiovascular death or myocardial infarction, as well as the risk of cardiovascular death, myocardial infarction, or ischemia-driven revascularization.

Read the NEJM Journal Watch Summary

[Image]
Antithrombotic Therapy after Acute Coronary Syndrome or PCI in Atrial Fibrillation

Lopes RD et al. for the AUGUSTUS Investigators. N Engl J Med 2019.

The Aspirin Placebo in Patients with Atrial Fibrillation and Acute Coronary Syndrome or Percutaneous Coronary Intervention (AUGUSTUS) trial enrolled patients with atrial fibrillation and a recent acute coronary syndrome or percutaneous intervention treated with a P2Y12 inhibitor. An antithrombotic regimen that included apixaban, without aspirin, resulted in less bleeding and fewer hospitalizations without significant differences in the incidence of ischemic events than regimens that included a vitamin K antagonist, aspirin, or both.

Read the NEJM Journal Watch Summary

[Image]
Percutaneous Coronary Intervention in Stable Angina (ORBITA): A Double-Blind, Randomised Controlled Trial

Al-Lamee R et al. on behalf of the ORBITA Investigators. Lancet 2017.

In the Objective Randomized Blinded Investigation with Optimal Medical Therapy of Angioplasty in Stable Angina (ORBITA) trail, PCI did not increase exercise time as compared with placebo in patients with medically treated angina and severe coronary stenosis.

Read the NEJM Journal Watch Summary

[Image]
Coronary-Artery Bypass Surgery in Patients with Ischemic Cardiomyopathy

Velazquez EJ et al. for the STICHES Investigators. N Engl J Med 2016.

In the Surgical Treatment for Ischemic Heart Failure (STICH) Extension Study (STICHES), the rates of death from any cause, death from cardiovascular causes, and death from any cause or hospitalization for cardiovascular causes were significantly lower over 10 years among patients with ischemic cardiomyopathy who underwent coronary artery bypass grafting (CABG) in addition to receiving medical therapy than among those who received medical therapy alone.

Read the NEJM Journal Watch Summary

[Image]
Ezetimibe Added to Statin Therapy after Acute Coronary Syndromes

Cannon CP et al. for the IMPROVE-IT Investigators. N Engl J Med 2015.

In the Improved Reduction of Outcomes: Vytorin Efficacy International Trial (IMPROVE-IT), ezetimibe added to statin therapy resulted in incremental lowering of LDL-cholesterol levels and improved cardiovascular outcomes.

Read the NEJM Journal Watch Summary

[Image]
Strategies for Multivessel Revascularization in Patients with Diabetes

Farkouh ME et al. for the FREEDOM Trial Investigators. N Engl J Med 2012.

In the Future Revascularization Evaluation in Patients with Diabetes Mellitus: Optimal Management of Multivessel Disease (FREEDOM) trial, coronary artery bypass grafting (CABG) was associated with lower rates of death and myocardial infarction but higher rates of stroke than percutaneous intervention (PCI) in patients with diabetes mellitus and multivessel coronary disease.

Read the NEJM Journal Watch Summary

[Image]
Fractional Flow Reserve-Guided PCI versus Medical Therapy in Stable Coronary Disease

De Bruyne B et al. for the FAME 2 Trial Investigators. N Engl J Med 2012.

In the Fractional Flow Reserve versus Angiography for Multivessel Evaluation 2 (FAME 2) trial, patients with stable coronary disease who had functionally significant coronary stenoses as determined by the measurement of fractional flow reserve (using a coronary artery pressure wire) were randomized to either percutaneous intervention (PCI) of the significant lesion or best available medical therapy. PCI reduced the risk of subsequent urgent revascularization.

Read the NEJM Journal Watch Summary

[Image]
Coronary-Artery Bypass Surgery in Patients with Left Ventricular Dysfunction

Velazquez EJ et al. for the STICH Investigators. N Engl J Med 2011.

In the Surgical Treatment for Ischemic Heart Failure (STICH) trial, patients with coronary disease and ejection fractions of 35% or less were randomized to either medical therapy alone or medical therapy plus coronary artery bypass grafting (CABG). CABG did not reduce the risk of all-cause mortality but did reduce the risk of death or hospitalization from cardiovascular causes.

Read the NEJM Journal Watch Summary

[Image]
Early versus Delayed Invasive Intervention in Acute Coronary Syndromes

Mehta SR et al. for the TIMACS Investigators. N Engl J Med 2009.

In the Timing of Intervention in Acute Coronary Syndromes (TIMACS) trial, patients with non-ST-segment elevation-acute coronary syndrome were randomized to routine early intervention or delayed intervention. Routine early intervention was particularly beneficial in patients with high baseline GRACE risk scores.

Read the NEJM Journal Watch Summary

[Image]
Ticagrelor versus Clopidogrel in Patients with Acute Coronary Syndromes

Wallentin L et al. for the PLATO Investigators. N Engl J Med 2009.

In the Study of Platelet Inhibition and Patient Outcomes (PLATO), the direct-acting P2Y12-inhibitor ticagrelor was compared with the thienopyridine prodrug P2Y12-inhibitor clopidogrel in patients with an acute coronary syndrome. Ticagrelor significantly reduced the risk of the composite endpoint of death from vascular causes, myocardial infarction, or stroke.

Read the NEJM Journal Watch Summary

[Image]
Percutaneous Coronary Intervention versus Coronary-Artery Bypass Grafting for Severe Coronary Artery Disease

Serruys PW et al. for the SYNTAX Investigators. N Engl J Med 2009.

In the Synergy between PCI with Taxus and Cardiac Surgery (SYNTAX) trial, patients with three-vessel or left-main coronary disease were randomized to either coronary artery bypass grafting (CABG) or percutaneous intervention (PCI). CABG patients had lower rates of subsequent revascularization, similar rates of death and myocardial infarction, and higher rates of stroke than PCI patients.

Read the NEJM Journal Watch Summary

[Image]
Optimal Medical Therapy with or without PCI for Stable Coronary Disease

Boden WE et al. for the COURAGE Trial Research Group. N Engl J Med 2007.

In the Clinical Outcomes Utilizing Revascularization and Aggressive Drug Evaluation (COURAGE) trial, patients with stable coronary artery disease and objective evidence of myocardial ischemia were treated with optimal medical therapy with or without percutaneous intervention (PCI). PCI did not reduce the risk of death, myocardial infarction, or other major cardiovascular events.

Read the NEJM Journal Watch Summary

[Image]
Prasugrel versus Clopidogrel in Patients with Acute Coronary Syndromes

Wiviott SD et al. for the TRITON-TIMI 38 Investigators. N Engl J Med 2007.

Prasugrel is a more potent thienopyridine prodrug P2Y12-inhibitor than clopidogrel, previously the standard antiplatelet agent for ACS. In the Trial to Assess Improvement in Therapeutic Outcomes by Optimizing Platelet Inhibition with Prasugrel-Thrombolysis in Myocardial Infarction (TRITON-TIMI) 38, prasugrel reduced the risk of adverse cardiovascular events but increased the risk of major bleeding.

Read the NEJM Journal Watch Summary

[Image]
The TIMI Risk Score for Unstable Angina/Non-ST Elevation MI: A Method for Prognostication and Therapeutic Decision Making

Antman EM et al. JAMA 2000.

TIMI risk score helps stratify risk of death and ischemic events in patients with UA or NSTEMI to help guide intervention and management.

Read the NEJM Journal Watch Summary

[Image]

Reviews

The best overviews of the literature on this topic

Reviews

Lipid Management for the Prevention of Atherosclerotic Cardiovascular Disease

Michos ED et al. N Engl J Med 2019.

Lipid-lowering therapies are a fundamental component of the management of cardiovascular risk. This review article discusses recommended approaches to use of lipid-lowering therapy in primary and secondary prevention.

[Image]
Chronic Stable Angina

Ohman EM. N Engl J Med 2016.

[Image]
Coronary-Artery Bypass Grafting

Alexander JH et al. N Engl J Med 2016.

[Image]
Stable Ischemic Heart Disease

Wilson JF. Ann Intern Med 2014.

[Image]
[Image]
[Image]
Primary PCI for Myocardial Infarction with ST-Segment Elevation

Keeley EC and Hillis LD. N Engl J Med 2007.

[Image]
[Image]

Guidelines

The current guidelines from the major specialty associations in the field

Guidelines

[Image]
[Image]
[Image]
[Image]
[Image]