Resident 360 Study Plans on AMBOSS
Find all Resident 360 study plans on AMBOSS
Fast Facts
A brief refresher with useful tables, figures, and research summaries
Hypertension
Hypertension is a common condition encountered in the outpatient setting and responsible for a significant portion of the mortality and morbidity from cardiovascular disease (CVD). The harms of hypertension are so well recognized today that it is hard to believe medicine did not emphasize the importance of treating high blood pressure (BP) until the second half of the 20th century. In this section, we will cover the following:
Blood Pressure and Mortality
![[Image]](content_item_media_uploads/Figure_10_wguwta.jpg)
![[Image]](content_item_media_uploads/Figure_9_lfzecc.jpg)
(Reprinted from The Lancet, Age-Specific Relevance of Usual Blood Pressure to Vascular Mortality: A Meta-Analysis of Individual Data for One Million Adults in 61 Prospective Studies. The Lancet 2002, with permission from Elsevier.)
Guidelines
History
In 1977, the Joint National Committee (JNC) on Detection, Evaluation, and Treatment of High Blood Pressure sponsored by the National Heart, Lung, and Blood Institute (NHLBI) published the first guideline on hypertension. As shown in the chart below, over the course of the next four decades, many landmark clinical trials continued to shape our understanding of hypertension management and optimal blood pressure.
Ultimately, it is important to individualize the approach to hypertension management when deciding treatment options and goals. For each patient, consider these factors:
underlying conditions
age
cardiovascular risk
treatment preferences
potential for adverse medication effects
![[Image]](content_item_media_uploads/nejmra1510067_f1_bqd41q.jpg)
(Source: Lessons in Uncertainty and Humility — Clinical Trials Involving Hypertension. N Engl J Med 2016.)
In 2015, the Systolic Blood Pressure Intervention Trial (SPRINT) showed a mortality and cardiovascular benefit in patients with a high risk of cardiovascular disease but without diabetes or stroke when treated to a target systolic BP of <120 mm Hg versus <140 mm Hg. However, some experts expressed concern regarding the generalizability of these findings because of the way in which BP was measured in the study — a mean of three measurements after the patient was seated for 5 minutes of quiet rest — potentially leading to lower readings than in typical practice. Notably, in the intensively treated group, the average achieved systolic BP remained above 120 mm Hg and was associated with more hypotensive adverse effects.
View a NEJM Quick Take video summary of the SPRINT trial, and read the NEJM Journal Watch summary.
Current Recommendations
In 2017, the American College of Cardiology (ACC), American Heart Association (AHA), and nine other societies published the current guidelines. These guidelines are heavily influenced by the results of the SPRINT trial and redefine BP categories and hypertension as follows:
Systolic BP (mm Hg) | Diastolic BP (mm Hg) | ||
---|---|---|---|
Normal | <120 | and | <80 |
Elevated | 120-129 | and | <80 |
Stage 1 hypertension | 130-139 | or | 80-89 |
Stage 2 hypertension | ≥140 | or | ≥90 |
The 2017 ACC/AHA guideline also incorporates 10-year risk of arteriosclerotic cardiovascular disease (ASCVD), as defined by the ASCVD risk estimator, into the treatment decision-making process. In brief, the recommended treatment algorithm is as follows:
10-year ASCVD risk | Lifestyle modification | Treatment | |
---|---|---|---|
Elevated BP | — | ✔︎ | ✘ |
Stage 1 hypertension | <10% | ✔︎ | ✘ |
≥10% | ✔︎ | ✔︎ | |
Stage 2 hypertension | — | ✔︎ | ✔︎ |
Some experts have expressed concern that the 2017 ACC/AHA guidelines will lead to the diagnosis of many more patients with hypertension and lead to excessive, unnecessary treatment. Ultimately, it is important to consider the guidelines along with the risks, benefits, and preferences of the individual patient when deciding treatment options and goals.
2020 International Society of Hypertension Global Hypertension Practice Guidelines
These international guidelines define hypertension as follows:
grade 1 hypertension: a systolic BP of 140−159 mm Hg and/or diastolic BP of 90−99 mm Hg
grade 2 hypertension: ≥160 systolic and/or ≥100 diastolic following repeated examination
2021 Screening for Hypertension in Adults U.S. Preventive Services Task Force Reaffirmation
Recommendation Statement: The 2021 USPSTF screening guidelines recommend that all adults be screened for hypertension in the office setting. In adults aged 18-39 years who do not have risk factors for hypertension, screening every 3-5 years is acceptable. However, in adults who are older than 40 years or who have risk factors for hypertension (e.g., Black, previously elevated BP, overweight or obese), then screening should be annual. Blood pressure measurements should also be obtained in the ambulatory setting for confirmation before initiating antihypertensive treatment.
Diagnosis and Treatment
Measuring Blood Pressure
The first step in treating hypertension requires properly measuring BP. Key points for accurate BP measurements include the following:
Diagnosis of hypertension should be based on the average of two or more properly measured readings at two or more follow-up visits after the initial screening visit.
The patient should sit quietly for 5 minutes if possible before measuring.
Use the right size cuff for the patient’s arm.
Check BP in both arms at the first screening and use the arm with the higher reading for subsequent measurements.
Consider ambulatory BP monitoring in patients who might have white coat hypertension (e.g., high BP only in a health care setting), which is associated with minimal increased risk of CVD.
In contrast, masked hypertension (normal office BP with elevated ambulatory BP) is associated with a risk of CVD and all-cause mortality similar to sustained hypertension. Although the data for screening and treatment of masked hypertension are still not entirely clear, the ACC guidelines recommend ambulatory BP monitoring in patients not on antihypertensive medication who have consistent office BPs of 120-129 mm Hg systolic or 75-79 mm Hg diastolic or in patients who — despite being treated for hypertension and have office BPs at goal — still have end-organ damage consistent with potentially untreated hypertension or are at high risk for ASCVD.
Lifestyle Interventions
All patients should start with lifestyle interventions to reduce blood pressure, including the following:
weight loss
the DASH diet
dietary sodium reduction
potassium supplementation
regular exercise (at least 150 minutes of moderate activity a week)
restricted alcohol use (two standard drinks per day for men and one per day for women)
Medications
The following table lists first- and second-line agents recommended in the 2017 ACC/AHA guideline, with specific notes for different classes.
Drug Class | Examples | Notes |
---|---|---|
First-line Agents | ||
Thiazide-type diuretics | Chlorthalidone, hydrochlorothiazide, metolazone |
|
Calcium-channel blockers | Dihydropyridines: amlodipine, felodipine, nifedipine |
|
ACE inhibitors or ARBs | Lisinopril, enalapril Losartan, valsartan |
|
Second-line Agents | ||
---|---|---|
Loop diuretics | Torsemide, furosemide |
|
Mineralocorticoid receptor antagonists | Spironolactone, eplerenone |
|
Potassium-sparing diuretics | Amiloride, triamterene |
|
Beta-blockers | Beta-1 selective: metoprolol tartrate, metoprolol succinate, atenolol, bisoprolol Beta and alpha: carvedilol, labetalol |
|
Direct renin inhibitor | Aliskiren |
|
Alpha-1 blockers | Doxazosin, terazosin |
|
Resistant Hypertension
Patients who have uncontrolled BP despite taking three antihypertensive medications including a diuretic or who need at least four medications to reach their goal are considered to have resistant hypertension. Make sure that these patients are adhering to their medication regimens, have accurate BP measurements, make lifestyle changes, and stop taking any interfering drugs or substances (e.g., alcohol, caffeine, NSAIDs, sympathomimetics). True resistant hypertension along with the following clinical features should prompt a workup for secondary causes:
severe hypertension
abrupt-onset hypertension
worsening of previously controlled hypertension
disproportionate target organ damage to degree of hypertension
onset of diastolic hypertension in those aged ≥65
-
unprovoked or excessive hypokalemia
age <30 (can still have primary hypertension)
Causes | Characteristics | Diagnostic Test(s) |
---|---|---|
Renal parenchymal disease (e.g., polycystic kidney disease) | Nocturia, frequency, hematuria, family history, elevated creatinine, abnormal urinalysis | Renal ultrasound |
Renovascular disease (e.g., fibromuscular dysplasia, atherosclerotic renal artery stenosis) | Sudden worsening or onset of hypertension in older patients, abdominal bruits, increased creatinine with ACE inhibitor/ARB treatment | Renal duplex Doppler ultrasound, MRA, CT, renal artery angiography |
Primary aldosteronism | Fatigue, muscle weakness, hypokalemia | Plasma aldosterone/renin ratio, abnormal aldosterone level after sodium loading, adrenal CT scan, adrenal vein sampling |
Obstructive sleep apnea | Snoring, poor sleep, daytime sleepiness | Screening questionnaires, polysomnography |
Pheochromocytoma | Paroxysmal hypertension, palpitations, diaphoresis, headache, family history | 24-hour urinary metanephrine or plasma metanephrine, CT or MRI of abdomen and pelvis |
Cushing syndrome | Weight gain, central adiposity, striae, muscle weakness, hyperglycemia, depression | Dexamethasone suppression test, 24-hour urinary cortisol, midnight salivary cortisol |
Hypothyroidism | Dry skin, cold intolerance, weight gain, constipation | Thyroid-stimulating hormone, free thyroxine |
Hyperthyroidism | Warm moist skin, heat intolerance, anxiety, diarrhea, insomnia | Thyroid-stimulating hormone, free thyroxine |
Coarctation of the aorta | Young patient, higher brachial BP than femoral, back or chest bruit | Echocardiography, MRA, CTA |
Research
Landmark clinical trials and other important studies
The SPRINT Research Group. N Engl J Med 2015.
This trial compared blood pressure targets of <120 mm Hg vs. <140 mm Hg in patients without diabetes but at risk for cardiovascular events. Patients assigned to the <120 mm Hg target had lower rates of fatal and nonfatal major cardiovascular events and death from any cause, but they also had significantly higher rates of some adverse events, such as acute kidney injury and syncope.
![[Image]](content_item_thumbnails/nejmoa1511939_f2.jpg)
The ACCORD Study Group. N Engl J Med 2010.
This trial compared treating to goal systolic BP of <120 mm Hg vs. <140 mm Hg in 4733 patients with type 2 diabetes and at high risk for cardiovascular events and found no decrease in the primary composite outcome of myocardial infarction, stroke, or cardiovascular death, annual rates of 1.87% vs. 2.09% (HR 0.88, 95% CI 0.73-1.06). There was a decrease in annual rates of stroke, 0.32% vs. 0.53% (HR 0.59, 95% CI 0.39-0.89) but more serious adverse events, 3.3% vs. 1.3% (P <0.001).
![[Image]](content_item_thumbnails/8548.jpg)
Verdecchia P et al. Lancet 2009.
The results of this trial support a lower systolic blood pressure goal (<130 mm Hg) in nondiabetic patients with hypertension.
![[Image]](content_item_thumbnails/10.1016-S0140-6736(09)61340-4.jpg)
Appel LJ et al. N Engl J Med 1997.
The landmark DASH trial randomized 459 adults to three different diets and showed that a diet rich in fruits, vegetables, and low-fat dairy foods; reduced in saturated fat, total fat, and cholesterol; and high in fiber, protein, potassium, magnesium, and calcium reduced systolic BP by 11.4 mm Hg in adults with hypertension (BP >140/90 mm Hg) and by 3.5 mm Hg in normotensive patients, both significantly more than a control diet.
![[Image]](content_item_thumbnails/8549.jpg)
Reviews
The best overviews of the literature on this topic
Christiansen SC and Zuraw BL. N Engl J Med 2019.
![[Image]](content_item_thumbnails/44888.jpg)
Oparil S et al. Nat Rev Dis Primers 2018.
![[Image]](content_item_thumbnails/44887.jpg)
Taler SJ. N Engl J Med 2018.
This article reviews the initial treatment of hypertension and discusses the 2017 ACC/AHA hypertension guidelines and the SPRINT trial.
![[Image]](content_item_thumbnails/8550.jpg)
Guidelines
The current guidelines from the major specialty associations in the field
U.S. Preventive Services Task Force 2021.
![[Image]](content_item_thumbnails/44890.jpg)
Unger T et al. Hypertension 2020.
![[Image]](content_item_thumbnails/44889.jpg)
Whelton PK et al. Hypertension 2018.
![[Image]](content_item_thumbnails/8553.jpg)
Additional Resources
Videos, cases, and other links for more interactive learning
YouTube 2019.
![[Image]](content_item_thumbnails/8554.jpg)
Langan R and Jones K. Am Fam Physician 2015.
Recommendations for initial management of hypertension based on the Eighth Joint National Committee (JNC8)
![[Image]](content_item_thumbnails/8484.jpg)
Yeh JS et al. N Engl J Med 2015.
In this case vignette highlighting the SPRINT trial, two experts discuss blood-pressure management in a 75-year-old woman with a BP of 136/72 mm Hg.
![[Image]](content_item_thumbnails/8485.jpg)